b PERFORMANCE OF THE EXISTING TRICKLING FILTER AT SOYSAPURA HOUSING SCHEME By S . G. G. Raj kumar Department of Civil Engineering University of Moratuwa Mo ra tuwa,Sri Lanka March,1997 PERFORMANCE OF THE EXISTING TRICKLING FILTER AT SOYSAPURA HOUSING SCHEME SOMASUNDARAM 6NANAPIRA6ASAM 6ANAN RAJKUMAR Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirement for the Degree of Master of Engineering in Environmental Engineering & Management Department of Civil Engineering University of Moratuwa March, 1997 67575 623. ^ THIS THESIS HAS NOT BEEN PREVIOUSLY PRESENTED IN WHOLE OR PART TO ANY UNIVERSITY OR INSTITUTION FOR A HIGHER DEGREE S.GTG. RAJKUMAR MARCH, 1997 ABSTRACT Communities living in flats produce both liquid and solid waste in large quantities. The liquid waste is called the wastewater. This wastewater will be a potential threat to the environment. Soysapura Housing Scheme treatment plant was taken up for this research study. This plant consists of Imhoff tank, trickling filter, humus tank and sludge drying beds. In this treatment plant performance of trickling filter was selected for detailed study. Grab samples were taken from inlet of the imhoff tank, trickling filter, humus tank and from the outlet of the humus tank. Grab samples were taken from 05 30 hrs. to 19 3 0 hrs. in two hourly intervals. Sampling was done by having a small gap between the first set of sampling and second set of sampling with the idea to see any variation in wastewater inflow patterns over a period. From the samples collected bio-chemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids (SS) and pH were determined. The performance of the trickling filter was under detail study. A relationship for organic loading and trickling filter efficiency was obtained. It was found that the removal efficiency improved with increase of organic loading. Also a relationship of COD & BOD for the influent of trickling filter was obtained. With the loading pattern, the plant could be classified as a low rate trickling filter. Also this plant could treat further additional load after carrying out the suggested improvements. The cause of trickling filter performance are discussed and areas which require further study and development are identified and recommendations are made for future investigations. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his deep gratitude to Mr. S. Pathinather, Senior Lecturer of the University of Moratuwa and the supervisor of this research for his guidance, encouragement and useful suggestions during this research study. The author acknowledges the assistance and encouragement given by Mr. L.S.P.J. De Silva, D.G.M. (Western), National Water Supply & Drainage Board (NWS&DB). The Cooperation extended by Mr. Melawathanthirige, Manager, Colombo Sewerage Operations, NWS&DB, is gratefully acknowledged. The author is thankful to Mr. Ranatunga, OIC, of the Soysapura, wastewater treatment plant for making necessary arrangement to collect sample and providing other need full assistance. The wastewater sample collectors, Mr. Dharmasiri & Mr. Piyasiri are gratefully appreciated. Sincere thanks are extended to Mrs. Shanthi Hewawasam for processing this script. The author is thankful to National Water Supply & Drainage Board for the facilities provided to carryout this research study. The facilities provided by the University of Moratuwa are gratefully appreciated. The author is grateful to Mr. M. Wickramage, Former G.M., NWSDB, Dr. S. Buvendralingam, Dr. M. Jayaweera and course coordinator Prof.(Mrs).N.Ratnayake for their contributions at the presentation prior to writing the thesis. The author gratefully appreciates the National Resources and Environmental Policy Project (NAREPP) for the financial assistance given to carryout this research study. Friends & colleagues are gratefully appreciated for their encouragement & assistance. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. v (I) Abstract i (II) Acknowledgement iii (III) Table of Contents v (IV) List of Figures x (V) List of Tables xi (VI) Notations xii Chapter 1 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 General 1 1.2 Objective of Sewage Treatment 4 1.3 History and Types of Attached Growth Biological Treatment 6 1.4 Scope of this Research 9 1.5 Arrangement of this Thesis 10 Chapter 2 2.0 Literature Review and Theoretical Consideration 11 2.1 Fixed Medium 12 2.2 Reaction & Interaction in Trickling Filter 13 2.3 Process Design 51 C h a p t e r 3 3.0 Methods and Materials 3.1 Experimental Work 3.2 Treatment Plant Description 3.3 Sampling 3.4 Sundry Information About Soysapura Trickling Filter C h a p t e r 4 4.0 Results 4.1 Relationship Between BOD and COD in the Influent to the Trickling Filter 4.2 Treatment Efficiency 4.3 Relationship between Organic Loading and Removal Efficiency 4.4 Pattern of Organic Loading C h a p t e r 5 5.0 Discussion, Conclusions and Recommendations 5.1 Discussion vi Page No, vii F 5.2 Organic Loading and Removal Efficiency 69 5.3 Present Performance 76 5.4 Conclusions 78 5.5 Recommendations 80 5.6 Recommendation for Further Work 81 List of References 82 Appendix A Tabulation of Results 86 Appendix B Photographs 100 A. LIST OF FIGURES Chapter 2 Figure 2.1 / Figure 2.2 Microbial Slime Layer Biological Filter Page No. 12 15 Figure 2.3 Diagram of Aerobic and Anaerobic Sublayer for a Trickling Filter 24 Figure 2.4 Under Drain Blocks in Trickling Filter 33 Figure 2.5 Typical Cross-Section of a Trickling Filter 35 Figure 2.6 Reaction Type Jet Nozzle 37 Figure 2.7 Chapter 3 Recirculation Patterns 48 Figure 3.1 Layout Plan of De Soysapura Sewage Treatment Plant 55 Figure 3.2 Chapter 4 Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 Figure 4.3 Figure 4.4 Details of Trickling Filter Relationship between BOD and COD for Trickling Filter Relationship between Organic Loading & Removal Efficiency of Trickling Filter Diurnal Organic Loading in Trickling Filter Diurnal Efficiency Variation in Trickling Filter 56 62 64 66 67 v i a I Chapter 2 Table 2.1 Tables Typical Information for Trickling Filter Page No, 45 Table 2.2 Appendix A Information on Physical Properties of Trickling Filter Media 46 Table 1 1.1 1 . 2 1.3 1.4 Results Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 86 87 88 89 90 Table 2 Average Results 91 Table 3 BOD and COD Loading in Trickling Filter 92 Table 4 Ratio of COD/BOD 5 on Average Results 93 Table 5 Treatment Efficiency on Average Results 94 Table 6 Efficiency on Individual Results 95 Table 7 Variation of BOD removal efficiency with loading rate in trickling filter 97 Table 8 Hourly variation of organic loading in trickling filter 98 Table 9 Efficiency variation in trickling filter removal 99 IX r Notations BOD Bio Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/1) cm Centimetre COD Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/1) Cu.m Cubic Metre (m3) d Day hrs. Hours Kg Kilogramme 1 Litre min minute m Metre Q Volumetric Flow Rate (m3/d) rev Revolution rpm Revolution Per Minute Sa Specific Surface Area per unit (m2/m3) volume Sec Second SS Suspended Solid (mg/1) T Temperature (°/C) V Volume (m3) W 7 Surface Area of Filter Medium (m2) x