Abstract:
The primary objective of this research is to identify the proper design guidelines in
terms of structural capacity, which enables to last longer life span without-any major failure. Inducing
very high stress on pavement is one of the major reasons for structural failure.'
American' Association of State Highway and Testing Officials (AASHTO) and the Transport Research
Laboratory Road Note 31.(TRL RN~31) ate the widely used pavement design guidelines by many road
agencies. Hence, this study intends to compare and contrast AASHTO (1994) and TRL RN-31.
AASHTO method involve with the complicated empirical equation 3 jn appendix which has to be
solved by iteration method to obtain the required structural capacity for given .conditions, So,
computer program was developed using JAVA to solve AASHTO equation. RN-31 and AASHTO
methods have been directly compared for a range of subgrade California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and
traffic levels.
Model pavements were constructed to e~aluate the performance' of the, pavement for static load and
field collected data were used' to verify 'the Finite Element Model (FEM).The verified models were
used to evaluate the structural performance of pavements. The main advaritag~ of this review on
flexible pavement design guidelines.is thatthe pavement which provide higher structural capacity can
be simply.identifiedand constructed, so that, it-can reduce the overall cost and provide goodplatform
to the users.
