dc.contributor.author |
Thilakasiri, HS |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-02-17T05:49:10Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-02-17T05:49:10Z |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/12403 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The pile load testing methods could be broadly classified into three categories: static, rapid and dynamic depending on the rate of loading. In this paper, the rapid load testing method referred to as the Statnamic test is discussed. The commonly used analysis
method of the statnamic testing referred to as the Unloading Point (UP) method is used successfully for the floating piles but validity of some of the assumptions of the unloading point method to end bearing bored piles is questionable. Due to this problem, other
analytical methods such as: Modified Unloading Point (MUP) method, Segmental Unloading Point (SUP) method and other signal matching techniques are introduced by some researches. Therefore, the validity of the unloading point method to rock socketed end bearing bored piles in Sri Lanka is investigated in this paper. This investigation is carried out using the commonly used wave number. Furthermore, the wave equation method, commonly used numerical procedure to model dynamic behavior of piles, is used by the author to investigate the validity of the assumptions associated with the unloading point method to rock socketed end bearing bored piles. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-1185 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Statnamic, bored piles, load testing, unloading point method. |
en_US |
dc.title |
Reliability of statnamic load testing of rock socketed end bearing bored piles |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference-Abstract |
en_US |
dc.identifier.faculty |
Engineering |
en_US |
dc.identifier.department |
Department of Civil Engineering |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2009 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.conference |
17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering |
en_US |
dc.identifier.place |
Alexandria |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
pp. 1185 - 1188 |
en_US |