Abstract:
Water generally contains suspended and colloidal solids from land erosion, decaying vegetation, microorganisms, and color producing compounds. In addition, due to urbanization and industrial development, pollution of water bodies has become a serious concern. As surface water is the most common source of water supply, the need for treatment of water increases as the surface water bodies get polluted.
Coagulation and flocculation using chemicals, followed by sedimentation or clarification, filtration and disinfection is the conventional method of removal of the above contaminants from raw water. A wide variety of chemicals are used to achieve good coagulation/flocculation in the water industry.
Aluminium Sulphate (alum) is one of the most widely used coagulants in Sri Lanka. The main reasons for the usage of alum are its affordability, availability and lack of low cost alternatives. However, there are other costs and problems associated with the use of alum. Due to the high sludge handling cost, pH adjustment and slow formation of flocs, and also recent issues related to availability of alum at a reasonable cost, the need has arisen to select alternative coagulants for the coagulation process. Poly Aluminium Chloride (PACL) is used as a coagulant in a few treatment plants in Sri Lanka and neighboring countries as an alternative to alum.
In this study, it was aimed to compare the performance of the two coagulants alum and PACL in turbidity and colour removal and to assess the feasibility of substituting alum with PACL. Jar tests were carried out to obtain the optimum coagulant doses required and floc size using water from the two sources supplying the Colombo North area (Kelani Ganga at Biyagama) and Colombo South area (Kalu Ganga at Kandana) when the seasonal variation in river flows caused variations in turbidity. In addition, a questionnaire survey was carried out to investigate the opinions of engineers, chemists and operators who have used both coagulants in the treatment process.
The study revealed that the overall performance of PACL is better than alum with respect to floc size and the optimum dosage required is less for the former. From the opinion survey, it was evident that the majority of those who have used both coagulants recommended the use of PACL, even though some modifications to Plant are needed.
