Abstract:
Teachers, learners, and educational materials are considered basic
ingredients of the teaching and learning process, but the physical environment in
which learning occurs where furniture has become an important component of
learning environment is often neglected. A study by Thariq et al (2004 under
review) on chair dimensions showed that various government tertiary education
institutes in Sri Lanka provide various design dimensions to manufacture lecture
hall chair, for a same user population to perform a same particular task.
The same study concluded that the presently used lecture hall chairs would not
match body dimensions of users therefore would be unhealthy and
uncomfortable for the user population. From the findings of the study they
recommended to measure the body dimensions of students of tertiary education
institutes and thereby to develop dimensions to design healthy and comfortable
institutional chairs. Abeysekara (1985), based on the anthropometric survey
among workers population carried out in Sri Lanka recommended dimensions for
work seat. Abeysekara's (1985) recommendations are based on the
anthropometric measurements of Sri Lankan worker population, which may not
match the recent student population of tertiary education institutes and needs
are also different between workers and students. The design dimensions presently
used in Sri Lanka to manufacture chairs are not based on the anthropometric
characteristics of Sri Lankan user population instead it has been copied from
British Standards and modified (Abeysekara, 2003). An ergonomic survey in Sri
Lanka conducted by Abeysekara (1996), an ergonomic expert, shows that the
common problem observed in the places (indoors) was the mismatch regarding
the works and their operating level, whether standing or seated.
Many research works revealed the consequences of mismatch of
furniture to the users. Evans et al (1988) concluded in a study, as bad posture
associated with badly designed chairs and tables, unfitting to children, in schools
are factors which may affect academic performance and physical
development of school children. Though this study is relevant to schoolchildren
the same is applicable for the students of the tertiary education institutes. A study
by Balaque et al (1988) showed a surprisingly high proportion of school students
reported suffering from musculoskeletal discomfort and low back pain. This is of
great concern because the strongest predictor of having future back pain is
often considered to be a previous history of such symptoms. A small body of
research has implicated the mismatch between school furniture and body size as
a causative factor for musculoskeletal discomfort and low back pain amongst
school students (Floyd and Ward 1969, Mandal 1982, Parcells et al 1999).
Colombini et al (1985) reported the increasing number of people spends their
working days sitting down, many of them complain back and neck pain. Almost
half of the population of the industrialized world is thought to be suffering from
some form of back complaint, many of them are related to poor seat design
(Mandel, 1985).
The chairs currently used in Sri Lankan tertiary education institutes do not
follow ergonomic design criteria i.e. matching to the body sizes of the users and
the material comfort characteristics of seat surface and backrest. In designing
chairs, concern to the task to be performed, localizing ergonomic criteria i.e.
matching the chairs to the users and integrating material characteristics of seat
surface and backrest according to user comfort are necessary to develop good
2
posture that would ensure functional efficiency, ease of use, comfort, health and
safety and quality of working life.
Therefore an understanding of the anthropometric characteristics of the user
population and the user comfort to the material characteristics of seat surface,
and backrest are important to design and construct healthy and comfortable
chairs for tertiary education institutes.