dc.contributor.author |
Thiwanka, RAY |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chandrathilake, SRMSR |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Asmone, AS |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Sandanayake, YG |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Karunasena, GI |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Fernando, NG |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-02-23T05:19:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-02-23T05:19:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014-06 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Thiwanka, R.A.Y., Chandrathilake, S.R.M.S.R., Asmone, A.S. (2014.). Market feasibility and practicability assessment of rubberised bitumen for Sri Lankan road pavements. In Y.G. Sandanayake, N.G. Fernando & G.I. Karunasena (Eds.), Sustainability and development in built environment: the way forward (pp. 365-372). Ceylon Institute of Builders. https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2014-Proceedings.pdf |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/17038 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Conventional Bitumen (CB) has limitations in Sri Lankan context due to its tropical climate, as CB’s
low stiffness modulus, low softening point, low viscosity, high temperature susceptibility and poor
cohesion properties are aggravated in this environment. This leads to cracks on the road surfaces, which
subsequently leads to surface failure because of frequent heavy rains in the region. Therefore, to avoid
the adverse properties of CB, the technical feasibility of modifying bitumen with natural rubber and
crumb rubber has been studied recently. However, the question remains whether these options are
economically feasible in the Sri Lankan context.
This paper presents a study which was carried out focusing the above issue. The study was carried out
based on a preliminary literature review on the use of Natural Rubber Modified Bitumen (NRMB) and
Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen (CRMB) to identify technical feasibility and impacts, and an expert
opinion survey with academic and industrial experts in the Highway field to identify the impacts.
These impacts were identified in three categories, i.e. Economic, Social and Environmental. Comparing
the economic impacts and lifecycle cost aspects it was concluded that NRMB and CRMB are more
economically feasible over CB. Moreover, during the study NRMB and CRMB were found to be more
environmentally and socially feasible as well. CRMB further provides additional benefits as it uses
recycled rubber, which in turn reduces environmental and social issues created by waste tyres.
Furthermore, CRMB has a lower cost of modification compared to the NRMB. Owing to these aspects
and the prevailing market situation, it was concluded that CRMB is more appropriate to Sri Lanka. |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Ceylon Institute of Builders (CIOB) |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Ceylon Institute of Builders |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2014-Proceedings.pdf |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Conventional bitumen |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Crumb rubber modified bitumen |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Natural rubber modified bitumen |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Economical feasibility |
en_US |
dc.title |
Market feasibility and practicability assessment of rubberised bitumen for Sri Lankan road pavements |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference-Full-text |
en_US |
dc.identifier.faculty |
Architecture |
en_US |
dc.identifier.department |
Department of Building Economics |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2014 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.conference |
3rd World Construction Symposium 2014 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.place |
Colombo |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
pp. 365-372 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.proceeding |
Sustainability and development in built environment: the way forward |
en_US |
dc.identifier.email |
asmone@outlook.com |
en_US |