dc.contributor.author |
Sabrina, NF |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ramachandra, T |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Gunatilake, S |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Sandanayake, YG |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Ramachandra, T |
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Gunatilake, S |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-03-09T11:32:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-03-09T11:32:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-06 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Sabrina, N.F., Ramachandra, T., & Gunatilake, S (2017). Sustainable facilities management (SFM): a review of practices and barriers. In Y.G. Sandanayake, T. Ramachandra & S. Gunatilake (Eds.), What’s new and what’s next in the built environment sustainability agenda? (pp. 440-449). Ceylon Institute of Builders. https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2017-Proceedings.pdf |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/17231 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Practicing sustainability helps Facilities Management (FM) professionals to re-position themselves from
traditional FM to strategic support function. However embracing sustainability is a challenging task as FM
scopes are firm specific and integrating sustainable practices are puzzling. Yet, incorporating sustainability
into FM practice has a great potential and FM professionals are identified at the forefront in delivering
sustainability. However, only few FM professionals are able to embrace the sustainability concept into their
operations due to various reasons such as; lack of capability, knowledge and skills, financial support and
support from government being the major barriers as per theory. Hence, this paper focusses on identifying
current FM scope with possible sustainable practices and explores the existing barriers to practice
sustainable facilities management (SFM).
A critical literature review was carried out into materials published in referred journals, conference papers
and books etc. The findings revealed that, FM scope could be expanded among 15 support services among
which building services and management, and real estate management were most commonly cited. In
addition, SFM practices were identified in terms of achieving economic, environment and social
sustainability. Accordingly, economic sustainability contains 2 strategies and 8 practices whileenvironment
sustainability and social sustainability consist of 3 strategies and 11 practices, and 4 strategies and 15
practices respectively. The review further indicated that 32 barriers existing to practice SFM. This
showcase that FM professionals need to focus on identifying firm specific FM scope and its sustainable
practices by improving their capabilities. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Ceylon Institute of Builders |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2017-Proceedings.pdf |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Barriers |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Facilities management (FM) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sustainable facilities management (SFM) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Support Services |
en_US |
dc.title |
Sustainable facilities management (sfm): a review of practices and barriers |
en_US |
dc.type |
Conference-Full-text |
en_US |
dc.identifier.faculty |
Architecture |
en_US |
dc.identifier.department |
Department of Building Economics |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2017 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.conference |
6th World Construction Symposium 2017 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.place |
Colombo |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
pp. 440-449 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.proceeding |
What’s new and what’s next in the built environment sustainability agenda? |
en_US |
dc.identifier.email |
sabrinanazeer@gmail.com |
en_US |