Institutional-Repository, University of Moratuwa.  

Comparison of sustainable materials for railway track support systems: a literature review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Senaratne, S
dc.contributor.author Mirza, O
dc.contributor.author Dekruif, T
dc.contributor.editor Sandanayake, YG
dc.contributor.editor Ramachandra, T
dc.contributor.editor Gunatilake, S
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-29T10:24:26Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-29T10:24:26Z
dc.date.issued 2017-06
dc.identifier.citation Senaratne, S., Mirza, O., & Dekruif, T. (2017). Comparison of sustainable materials for railway track support systems: a literature review. In Y.G. Sandanayake, T. Ramachandra & S. Gunatilake (Eds.), What’s new and what’s next in the built environment sustainability agenda? (pp. 123-130). Ceylon Institute of Builders. https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2017-Proceedings.pdf en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/17505
dc.description.abstract Timber transoms have been extensively used in the railway industry for decades and are considered the most efficient and effective in terms of reliability and performance for railway infrastructure transom components However, many studies have raised concerns surrounding the future of sustainable use and cyclic maintenance and replacement requirement of timber transom’s in railway infrastructure Over the past decade, there has been significant research and development in alternative railway transom replacements using a variety of new materials. It is vital to develop a detailed understanding of existing and new alternative transom materials that are emerging into the railway industry and delineate whether these materials may be suitable as a sustainable alternative to traditional methods. Hence, the aim of this paper was to evaluate suitability of alternative transom materials as a substitute to existing transom materials in railway track support systems. The alternative materials considered were Precast Concrete and Composite Fibre Technology Panels against the conventional timber transforms. The paper offers a comparison between these materials through a literature review. It was concluded that the fibre composite alternative has the most beneficial alternative transom option and the railway industry could consider this material as an innovative, sustainable material for railway track support system. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ceylon Institute of Builders en_US
dc.relation.uri https://ciobwcs.com/downloads/WCS2017-Proceedings.pdf en_US
dc.subject Fibre composite technology en_US
dc.subject Precast concrete en_US
dc.subject Railway track support systems en_US
dc.subject Sustainability timber transforms en_US
dc.title Comparison of sustainable materials for railway track support systems: a literature review en_US
dc.type Conference-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.faculty Architecture en_US
dc.identifier.department Department of Building Economics en_US
dc.identifier.year 2017 en_US
dc.identifier.conference 6th World Construction Symposium 2017 en_US
dc.identifier.place Colombo en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos pp. 123-130 en_US
dc.identifier.proceeding What’s new and what’s next in the built environment sustainability agenda? en_US
dc.identifier.email s.senaratne@westernsydney.edu.au en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record