Institutional-Repository, University of Moratuwa.  

Assessment of laboratory and field compaction of dense graded aggregate bases (dgab)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bambarandage, AR
dc.contributor.author Jayantha, WRAN
dc.contributor.author Mampearachchi, WK
dc.contributor.editor Pasindu, HR
dc.contributor.editor Bandara, S
dc.contributor.editor Mampearachchi, WK
dc.contributor.editor Fwa, TF
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-23T06:24:33Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-23T06:24:33Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation ***** en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20229
dc.description.abstract Dense Graded Aggregate Base (DGAB) construction is a major contributing component in flexible pavement construction in terms of pavement structural capacity and the project cost. However, the production processes related to DGAB construction impose more significant financial, environmental, and social concerns, which stresses the effective compaction in DGAB construction. DGAB compaction process is controlled by three governing factors: moisture content (MC), compaction effort, and layer thickness, where compaction effort can be minimized when field compaction takes place at MC levels closer to the estimated Optimum Moisture Content (OMC). Hence, the relationship among maximum dry density (MDD), OMC, and compaction effort should be well established for a given layer thickness in such a laboratory method that best interprets the field practice. Information on the current industry compaction practices was gathered by conducting a questionnaire survey. Simultaneously, laboratory and field tests were carried out to compare the compaction behavior of DGAB at different MCs and energy levels. Moisture density plots of different laboratory and field compaction tests were compared to determine the most suitable laboratory compaction method to simulate the field compaction of DGAB. The study revealed that the vibratory hammer test resulted in the highestMDDand the lowestOMC,wheremoisture-density curves of the field compaction tests were approaching the vibratory hammer test curve with the increase of compaction effort, emphasizing that the vibratory hammer test best simulates field compaction, when compared to other laboratory impact compaction tests. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.subject Compaction effort en_US
dc.subject Moisture content en_US
dc.subject Dry density en_US
dc.subject Vibratory hammer en_US
dc.subject Field compaction en_US
dc.subject Energy optimization en_US
dc.title Assessment of laboratory and field compaction of dense graded aggregate bases (dgab) en_US
dc.type Conference-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.faculty Engineering en_US
dc.identifier.year 2021 en_US
dc.identifier.conference Road and Airfield Pavement Technology en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos pp. 315-329 en_US
dc.identifier.proceeding Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Road and Airfield Pavement Technology, 2021 en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87379-0_23 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record