dc.contributor.author |
Perera, ATD |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Attalage, RA |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Perera, KKCK |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dassanayake, VPC |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-02-21T04:09:46Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-02-21T04:09:46Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Perera, A. T. D., Attalage, R. A., Perera, K. K. C. K., & Dassanayake, V. P. C. (2013). A hybrid tool to combine multi-objective optimization and multi-criterion decision making in designing standalone hybrid energy systems. Applied Energy, 107, 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.049 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0306-2619 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20559 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Hybrid energy systems (HESs) are becoming popular for standalone applications due to global concern
regarding green house gas (GHG) emissions and depletion of fossil fuel resources. Research in the optimal
design of HESs is ongoing, with numerous optimization techniques giving special emphasis to Pareto
optimization, incorporating conflicting objectives. The subsequent decision-making process including
the non-dominant set of solutions has yet to be addressed.
This work focuses on combining multi-objective optimization with a multi-criterion decision making
(MCDM) technique to support decision makers in the process of designing HESs. Four different objectives,
i.e., levelized energy cost (LEC), unmet load fraction, wasted renewable energy (WRE) and fuel consumption
are used to obtain the Pareto front. A decision support tool based on Fuzzy TOPSIS and level diagrams
is proposed to analyze the Pareto front and support the subsequent decision-making activity. A case
study is used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. The study shows that the novel
method is useful when determining the relative weights of objectives, providing a detailed picture of
the objective space to the designer when coming up with the optimum system. The technique proposed
in this study can be further extended to analyze similar problems in energy system design where MCDM
is necessary after multi-objective optimization. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Hybrid energy systems |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Standalone applications |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Multiple-criteria decision making |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Fuzzy TOPSIS and level diagrams |
en_US |
dc.title |
A hybrid tool to combine multi-objective optimization and multi-criterion decision making in designing standalone hybrid energy systems |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article-Full-text |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2013 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.journal |
Applied Energy |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
107 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.database |
ScienceDirect |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
412-425 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.049 |
en_US |