Institutional-Repository, University of Moratuwa.  

Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author De Silva, N
dc.contributor.author Weerasinghe, RPNP
dc.contributor.author Madhusanka, HWN
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-16T03:32:37Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-16T03:32:37Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation De silva, N., Weerasinghe, R., Madhusanka, N., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2017). Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM). Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7, 00–00. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2016-0037 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2044-124X en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20730
dc.description.abstract Purpose – A case is made for developing “Relationally Integrated Value Networks for Total Facilities Management” (RIVANS-TFM) by synergistically connecting significant stakeholders of the project management (PM) and facilities management (FM) phases to deliver substantially better value for the end users of built infrastructure. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A structured questionnaire survey enabled identification of typically significant stakeholders in the PM and FM phases. In total, 14 key stakeholders were identified through t-test analysis in this Sri Lankan study. Semi-structured interviews unveiled relationships among the aforementioned stakeholders and the findings were used to develop the “required” RIVANS-TFM, as well as the “existing” RIVANS-TFM, using the UCINET social network analysis software package. Social network theory of relationships was applied to analyze the networks in terms of “Structural Holes” or missing links and “Brokerage Potentials.” Findings – Structural holes analysis highlighted the existing setup to be more vulnerable to missing links than the “required”/targeted setup. Furthermore, brokerage potentials analysis revealed that owners, project managers, facility managers, maintenance engineers, main contractors, designers, principal consultants, and other specialist consultants can act as “brokers” to bridge the gaps or minimize structural holes, thereby uplifting and reinforcing the existing network to deliver better performance and value in TFM. Originality/value – By revealing existing and required levels of integration of each stakeholder in RIVANS-TFM, clients are provided a great opportunity to identify the stakeholders who should be engaged more, or less – in order to best achieve clients’ long-term aspirations and project objectives. Furthermore, the findings also indicate appropriate levels of stakeholder relationships to target, in order to maintain efficient flows of information, material and services in the supply chains while enhancing TFM life-cycle values. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited en_US
dc.subject Construction industry en_US
dc.subject Project management en_US
dc.subject Social network en_US
dc.subject Life-cycle value en_US
dc.subject Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) en_US
dc.subject Total facilities management (TFM) en_US
dc.title Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM) en_US
dc.type Article-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.year 2017 en_US
dc.identifier.journal Built Environment Project and Asset Management en_US
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.volume 7 en_US
dc.identifier.database Emerald en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos 313-329. en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2016-0037 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record