dc.contributor.author |
De Silva, N |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Weerasinghe, RPNP |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Madhusanka, HWN |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-03-16T03:32:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-03-16T03:32:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
De silva, N., Weerasinghe, R., Madhusanka, N., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2017). Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM). Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 7, 00–00. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2016-0037 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2044-124X |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20730 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Purpose – A case is made for developing “Relationally Integrated Value Networks for Total Facilities
Management” (RIVANS-TFM) by synergistically connecting significant stakeholders of the project
management (PM) and facilities management (FM) phases to deliver substantially better value for the end
users of built infrastructure. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach – A structured questionnaire survey enabled identification of typically
significant stakeholders in the PM and FM phases. In total, 14 key stakeholders were identified through t-test
analysis in this Sri Lankan study. Semi-structured interviews unveiled relationships among the aforementioned
stakeholders and the findings were used to develop the “required” RIVANS-TFM, as well as the “existing”
RIVANS-TFM, using the UCINET social network analysis software package. Social network theory of relationships
was applied to analyze the networks in terms of “Structural Holes” or missing links and “Brokerage Potentials.”
Findings – Structural holes analysis highlighted the existing setup to be more vulnerable to missing links
than the “required”/targeted setup. Furthermore, brokerage potentials analysis revealed that owners, project
managers, facility managers, maintenance engineers, main contractors, designers, principal consultants, and
other specialist consultants can act as “brokers” to bridge the gaps or minimize structural holes, thereby
uplifting and reinforcing the existing network to deliver better performance and value in TFM.
Originality/value – By revealing existing and required levels of integration of each stakeholder in
RIVANS-TFM, clients are provided a great opportunity to identify the stakeholders who should be engaged
more, or less – in order to best achieve clients’ long-term aspirations and project objectives. Furthermore, the
findings also indicate appropriate levels of stakeholder relationships to target, in order to maintain efficient flows
of information, material and services in the supply chains while enhancing TFM life-cycle values. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Construction industry |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Project management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Social network |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Life-cycle value |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Total facilities management (TFM) |
en_US |
dc.title |
Relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM) |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article-Full-text |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2017 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.journal |
Built Environment Project and Asset Management |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issue |
3 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
7 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.database |
Emerald |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
313-329. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2016-0037 |
en_US |