Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Perera, D
dc.contributor.author Upasiri, IR
dc.contributor.author Poologanathan a, K P
dc.contributor.author Gatheeshgar, P
dc.contributor.author Sherlock, P
dc.contributor.author Hewavitharana, T
dc.contributor.author TSuntharalingam
dc.date.accessioned 2023-05-10T09:42:59Z
dc.date.available 2023-05-10T09:42:59Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Perera, D., Upasiri, I. R., Poologanathan, K., Gatheeshgar, P., Sherlock, P., Hewavitharana, T., & Suntharalingam, T. (2021). Energy performance of fire rated LSF walls under UK climate conditions. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103293 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2352-7102 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/21039
dc.description.abstract Light-gauge Steel Frame (LSF) systems, one of the emerging building practices can be susceptible for catastrophic failure in fire accidents and less energy efficient due to the high thermal conductance of Cold Formed (CF) steel elements and resulting thermal bridging effect. Apart from independent investigations and optimization on LSF walls against fire and energy performance, it is vital to build-up knowledge on energy performance of fire rated LSF walls. Therefore, a series of fire rated conventional and modular LSF wall panels, which covers a wide range of industrial practices in European countries, have been investigated for their thermal transmittance, U-Value in the present study. Firstly, Finite Element Models (FEM) for three LSF wall panels were developed and validated against previous results. Subsequently, these models were extended to analyse the U-Values of the parametric specimens. The results show that, the concepts of back-blocking panels and discontinuous insulation options account for only slight improvements of U-Value (3–5%). Moreover, the variation of U-Value with respect to the cavity insulation ratio is found to be quite interesting, that adding cavity insulation at very low Insulation Ratios (IR) like 0.2 to 0.4, a 40%–60% reduction in the U-Value is obtained while further increase in IR results in less than 10% U-Value reduction. Therefore, 0.2 to 0.4 IR is proposed for conventional and modular LSF walls for appreciable energy performance avoiding unnecessary compensation in terms of costs, weight of the structure and structural fire performance. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject Thermal transmittance en_US
dc.subject U-value en_US
dc.subject Modular construction en_US
dc.subject Insulation ratio en_US
dc.subject Back blocking panels en_US
dc.subject Discontinuous insulation en_US
dc.subject Energy efficient LSF Walls en_US
dc.title Energy performance of fire rated LSF walls under UK climate conditions en_US
dc.type Article-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.year 2021 en_US
dc.identifier.journal Journal of Building Engineering en_US
dc.identifier.volume 44 en_US
dc.identifier.database ScienceDirect en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos 103293 en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103293 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record