dc.contributor.author |
Perera, D |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Upasiri, IR |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Poologanathan, K |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Perampalam, G |
|
dc.contributor.author |
O’Grady, K |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rezazadeh, M |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rajanayagam, H |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hewavitharana, T |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-06-23T08:15:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-06-23T08:15:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Perera, D., Upasiri, I. R., Poologanathan, K., Perampalam, G., O’Grady, K., Rezazadeh, M., Rajanayagam, H., & Hewavitharana, T. (2022). Fire performance analyses of modular wall panel designs with loadbearing SHS columns. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01179[18p.]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01179 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2214-5095 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/21151 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Modular Building Systems (MBS) are still in the phase of developing its popularity in the industry,
with emerging novel designs. Initially, MBS walls and floors had been highly influenced by the
Light-gauge Steel Frame (LSF) designs made of Cold-Formed (CF) steel studs, either as loadbearing
or non-loadbearing types which have been extensively researched all over the world.
However, recently the MBS practice in the industry tends to incorporate Square Hollow Section
(SHS) steel columns for their improved structural performance and convenience at the
manufacturing stage despite of the limited research knowledge in terms of the Fire Resistance
Level (FRL). Moreover, catastrophic failures and fatal accidents are common with steel-based
structures in case of a fire. Hence, the fire performance of loadbearing modular walls with SHS
columns have been identified as a critical research gap. Firstly, Finite Element Models (FEM) were
developed for the original modular wall, a Light-weight Timber Frame (LTF) wall and some LSF
walls. The FEM analyses results very well matched with the full-scale experimental results so that
the FEM techniques were confidently used to study the effect of variables chosen based on material
availability options, cost reduction and construction practice. Structural and Insulation
FRLs have been evaluated for the chosen parametric walls, where the produced graphs of
structural and insulation FRLs can be referred to determine the adequate thickness of column
sheathing and the Insulation Ratio (IR) respectively. The choice of non-loadbearing stud type can
be evaluated against other limitations related to energy, cost and construction practice |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Loadbearing modular walls |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Square Hollow Section |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Structural FRL |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Load Ratio |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Insulation Ratio |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Heat Transfer Analyses |
en_US |
dc.title |
Fire performance analyses of modular wall panel designs with loadbearing SHS columns |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article-Full-text |
en_US |
dc.identifier.year |
2022 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.journal |
Case Studies in Construction Materials |
en_US |
dc.identifier.volume |
17 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.database |
ScienceDirect |
en_US |
dc.identifier.pgnos |
e01179[18p.] |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01179 |
en_US |