Institutional-Repository, University of Moratuwa.  

Influence of behavioural constructs on building practitioner’s minimal compliance with residential building energy performance standards in Australia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lu, Y
dc.contributor.author Karunasena, G
dc.contributor.author Liu, C
dc.contributor.editor Sandanayake, YG
dc.contributor.editor Waidyasekara, KGAS
dc.contributor.editor Ranadewa, KATO
dc.contributor.editor Chandanie, H
dc.date.accessioned 2024-08-29T04:26:58Z
dc.date.available 2024-08-29T04:26:58Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.uri http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/22742
dc.description.abstract Energy performance standards for residential buildings are essential in promoting the residential building industry’s energy efficiency. Dwellings are commonly designed at the standards’ minimum compliance level, which puts the industry at risk of achieving its energy-efficiency goal. One of the causes of this minimal compliance is related to building practitioners’ behavioural constructs during the compliance process: Attitudes (ATT), Subjective Norms (SN), Perceived Behavioural Control (PBC) and Personal Norms (PN). This paper aims to investigate how these behavioural constructs influence minimal compliance. The data are drawn from a questionnaire survey of 73 residential building practitioners who actively deal with compliance requirements in the design stage in Australia. A framework predominantly based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour was analysed via structural equation modelling technique to illustrate the influence paths of the behavioural constructs and the extent of the influence. The results show that SN, PBC and PN positively influence behavioural intention, then the intention positively influences minimal compliance outcome. Furthermore, ATT shows the strongest extent in influencing the minimal compliance outcome, while exhibiting the lowest current performance. These findings inform policymakers of suitable interventions to trigger behaviour change toward going beyond minimal compliance. By illustrating the pathways and the degree to which behavioural constructs influence minimal compliance, policymakers can be more effectively guided on appropriate interventions to encourage behaviour change that exceeds minimal compliance. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Building Economics en_US
dc.subject Building Practitioner en_US
dc.subject Compliance Behaviour en_US
dc.subject Energy Performance Standard en_US
dc.subject Minimal Compliance en_US
dc.subject Residential Building en_US
dc.title Influence of behavioural constructs on building practitioner’s minimal compliance with residential building energy performance standards in Australia en_US
dc.type Conference-Full-text en_US
dc.identifier.faculty Architecture en_US
dc.identifier.department Department of Building Economics en_US
dc.identifier.year 2024 en_US
dc.identifier.conference World Construction Symposium - 2024 en_US
dc.identifier.place Colombo en_US
dc.identifier.pgnos pp. 594-606. en_US
dc.identifier.proceeding 12th World Construction Symposium - 2024 en_US
dc.identifier.email yi.lu@deakin.edu.au en_US
dc.identifier.email gayani.karunasena@deakin.edu.au en_US
dc.identifier.email chunlu.liu@deakin.edu.au en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2024.47 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • WCS - 2024 [87]
    Proceedings of The 12th World Construction Symposium 2024

Show simple item record