dc.contributor.advisor |
Kulathunga, U |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Goonatilake, MDMJ |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2025-01-20T08:58:01Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2025-01-20T08:58:01Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Goonatilake, M.D.M.J. (2024). Analysis of the perception of legal and institutional framework relating to public private partnerships [Master's theses, University of Moratuwa]. Institutional Repository University of Moratuwa. http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/23200 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/23200 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The research on “Analysis of the Perception of Legal and Institutional Framework Relating
to Public Private Partnerships” is undertaken to form an opinion of the aforementioned
framework from the viewpoint of Contracting Authorities and the private sector. Public
Private Partnerships (PPP) is the way forward for countries like Sri Lanka, in developing
infrastructure. The PPP model enables Governments to be pro-active and envisage
development, without being constrained by limitations in national budgets. Also the ability
to allow advanced technologies in infrastructure development to be brought in by private
investors under the PPP model greatly enhances the capability of developing countries to
move up the development ladder. Sri Lanka has been implementing PPP projects for more
than 2 decades, however, the consistency and continuity of implementation is not observed
compared to neighboring and countries with similar economies. The flipside of such
inconsistency is the lack of economic benefits to the country and slower economic growth
rates. Accordingly, it is crucial that the current PPP framework is analyzed from the
perceptive of both the public and private stakeholders involved and understand its’ strengths
and weaknesses, while also seeking avenues to improve and develop the framework to be
more hospitable for PPP project implementation. Key areas identified as issues and
challenges in the current framework are disconnect between the existing legal framework
and the project document preparation, lack of policy on prioritization, optimization and
economic benefits, lack of coordination between stakeholder government institutions and
identifying the current PPP framework only as a guideline. Through the comparisons with
successful frameworks and suggestions by experts the key improvements would be
establishing an independent centralized committee with a mandate to prioritize, coordinate
and implement PPP, introduction of PPP policy and a dedicated legislature with standardized
documents, and improved accountability of document preparation and review committees.
Keywords: Public Private Partnerships, Perception, Legal and Institutional Framework,
Challenges and Improvements |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.subject |
CHALLENGES AND IMPROVEMENTS |
|
dc.subject |
LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK |
|
dc.subject |
PERCEPTION | PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS |
|
dc.subject |
BUILDING ECONOMICS- Dissertation |
|
dc.subject |
CONSTRUCTION LAW AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION- Dissertation |
|
dc.subject |
MSc in Construction Law and Dispute Resolution |
|
dc.title |
Analysis of the perception of legal and institutional framework relating to public private partnerships |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis-Abstract |
en_US |
dc.identifier.faculty |
Architecture |
en_US |
dc.identifier.degree |
Master of Science in Construction Law and Dispute Resolution |
en_US |
dc.identifier.department |
Department of Building Economics |
en_US |
dc.date.accept |
2024 |
|
dc.identifier.accno |
TH5521 |
en_US |