The scope of the study was to develop a cost reflective, economically efficient tariff structure for a typical
distribution system with a case study on Western Province South(WPS) of the Ceylon Electricity Board
(CEB). The WPS is one of the CEB's provinces in administrating the electricity distribution system.
Different tariff structures were developed under two approaches. They are; one based on average
incremental cost and the other based on average historical cost.
In order to develop above tariff structures future load forecasts were made using the past rends and the
planning period for the tariff study was taken as from 2002 to 2009.Theenergy, peak power and loses for
the above period were established. Future costs including investments, system augmentation and
rehabilitation costs, operation and maintenance costs were established for the planning period. Using
above data, tariff structures were developed using AIC principals under four scenarios to see the effect of
different parameters. Average historical cost based tariff was developed using 200 I data and it
establishes a slightly lower tariff than the AIC based tariffs. Also, prices are differentiated only on voltage
levels in the historical cost based tariff due to the non-availability of adequate data. Sensitivities of these
tariffs were checked for the purchase price and for the discount rate. All these tariff structures were
compared and most appropriate tariff was selected which differentiate prices on voltage levels, time of
usage, and contribution to the peak.
As the average generation costs of CEB has been continuously increased since 2000 due to the emergency
and hired thermal power, a more realistic price at the grid sub level was established based on the thermal
and hydro costs, and the generation mix It was found that this price is Rs. 5.73 per kWh at grid substation
level. With this purchase price: the proposed tariff was revalued to establish the final tariff structure. This
final tariff generates an average selling price of Rs. 7.35. This final tariff is then compared with the
present.
it charges higher price for Domestic, LECO and Street light consumers and charge a lower price for
Industrial and Commercial consumers. It was further studied the possibility of maintaining the same tariff
as present for the Domestic consumers. In this case it was found, a subsidy of Rs J .13 billion has to be
paid annually to the utility.
