Abstract:
With respect to the other disciplines of Engineering, Wind Engineering is at its
premature state in Sri Lanka. The only mandatory document available in Sri Lanka is
the design manual, named as “Design buildings for high winds-Sri Lanka”, which
generally covers the construction methods and techniques that can be used to improve
the wind resistance ability of low-rise buildings. Since Sri Lanka does not possess its
own wind loading standards, the common practice is to utilize various international
wind loading standards and the most widely used is CP 3 Chapter V Part 2:1972.As many countries in the world, Sri Lanka also has a trend to construct high-rise
building at its city centres, especially in the city of Colombo. In this context, the
designers as well as regulating bodies face many problems, such as non-uniformity
among wind load calculations, lack of verification for the methods and factors that are
given in different standards, when utilize in Sri Lankan context, uncertainty of the
achieved risk levels for load combinations with load factors, etc. Therefore, it is
worthwhile to produce at least a document, which can guide the practice engineers to
properly select and subsidize a utilize standard for design.CP3 Chapter V-Part 2:1972, AS 1170.2:1989, AS/NZS 1170.2:2002, BS 6399.2:1997
and BS EN 1991-1-4:2005 are the codes and standards that have been used in this
particular study. These codes are selected, by considering many factors such as
previous practice in Sri Lanka, available data, new technologies, method and factors
proposed in the recent times in the wind engineering etc. Wind loads derived from
above five standards were applied in two buildings with different heights, which are
48 m and 183 m in height to cover both static and dynamic analysis methods given in
wind loading standards. Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Techniques have been
used to evaluate the various strategies adopting by different standards such as division
– by – parts rule given in British and Euro codes.From the studies carried out in this research, it can be noted that the two types of wind
speed values as defined in wind loading manual can be used to design law rise and
high rise buildings within certain accepted risk levels. Further, it is recommended to
apply windward and leeward pressures separately to evaluate wind induce forces in
structural members of a building. The discrepancies among CP3 Chapter V – Part
2:1972 and other selected standards have been evaluated by the means of structural
vi
forces in columns, beams, concrete shells and base reactions and results are shown as
normalised forces with respective to load obtained from CP3 Chapter V – Part 2:1972.
The behaviour of the two buildings at serviceability limit condition was evaluatedby
using both acceleration and drift index values according to selected standards.Final observations and recommendations would lead practise engineers to select one
of these wind loading standards for making a building with more wind resistant
capabilities and higher satisfaction in comfort levels to its occupants.