DEVELOPMENT OF CONDUCTIVE AND BIODEGRADABLE NANOFIBROUS YARNS: STUDY OF ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES Puwakdandawe Vishakha Thilini Weerasinghe (188058V) Degree of Master of Science Department of Textile and Clothing Technology University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka January 2020 DEVELOPMENT OF CONDUCTIVE AND BIODEGRADABLE NANOFIBROUS YARNS: STUDY OF ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES Puwakdandawe Vishakha Thilini Weerasinghe (188058V) Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Textile and Clothing Technology Department of Textile and Clothing Technology University of Moratuwa Sri Lanka January 2020 i Declaration “I declare that this is my own work and this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a Degree or Diploma in any other University or institute of higher learning and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where the acknowledgement is made in the text. Also, I hereby grant to University of Moratuwa the non-exclusive right to reproduce and distribute my thesis, in whole or in part in print, electronic or other medium. I retain the right to use this content in whole or part in future works (such as articles or books).” Signature: …………………………… Date: ………………….. “The above candidate has carried out research for the Master’s thesis under my supervision.” Name of the supervisor: ………………………………………………………………. Signature of supervisor: …………………………… Date: ………………….. Name of the supervisor: ………………………………………………………………. Signature of supervisor: …………………………… Date: ………………….. ii Abstract Electrically conductive and biodegradable materials are desired for a vast array of applications in wearable and flexible electronic areas to address the growing ecological problem of e-waste. Herein, we report on the design and fabrication of all-organic, conductive and biodegradable yarn using polyaniline (PANi) and polycaprolactone (PCL). The process of PANi incorporation is achieved in two ways; i) electrospinning a blend of PANi and PCL solution ii) in-situ polymerization of PANi on the nanofibrous surface of PCL electrospun fibers. The electrospun PANi incorporated webs are cut into ribbons and twisted to develop twisted yarns. A customized setup was used to produce continuous electrospun yarns. The effect of different degrees of PANi blended into PCL was investigated. Moreover, the effect of an array of aniline concentrations in coated fibers were studied. PCL/PANi blended solution with 2% PANi resulted in nanofibers with resistance of 10 ± 4 MΩ/cm. Fibers coated with 1% aniline concentration resulted in the core-shell fibers with of 50 ± 8 kΩ/cm. Increasing the number of plies of yarn to 3 plies resulted in a 3-fold reduction of the resistance. The twisted plied yarns were incorporated into fabric by stitching or weaving to demonstrate the stability of conductivity over mechanical forces. Both PANi blended and PANi coated yarns were found to be biodegradable in controlled environmental conditions. The use of PANi blended yarn as a biomaterial for tissue engineering and PANi coated yarns as a wearable electrode for capacitive sensors were demonstrated. The electromechanical behavior of PANi coated yarn is expected to provide inspiration for the production of highly sensitive strain sensors. This approach presents an early step on the way to the realization of all organic conductive biodegradable nanofibrous yarns for sustainable smart textiles. Key words: Conductive polymers, nanofibrous yarns, biodegradable, electrospinning, polyaniline iii Dedication I dedicate my thesis to all my professors and doctors and scientists for the extensive knowledge you share with me. Your unselfish guidance increased my passion for nanotechnology. iv Acknowledgement I wish to acknowledge who supported me in numerous ways to achieve my MSc. First, I am indebted to research supervisor Dr. N.D. Wanasekara, Senior Lecturer, Department of Textile and Clothing Technology, University of Moratuwa for invaluable support, and motivation he readily gave me to accomplish this research .His patience in guiding me, vast knowledge, advice and experience helped me in many ways to conclude my research. I would like to express appreciation thanks to Dr. (Mrs.) D.G.K. Dissanayake, Senior Lecturer, Department of Textile and Clothing Technology, University of Moratuwa, insightful comments and encouragement from the start to the very end of the days I worked on this thesis and also, magnanimous way of educating me to the world of scientific publication, are very much appreciated. Besides my supervisors, I am also thankful towards my progress review committee: Dr. Srimala Perera and Dr. T.S.S. Jayawardena for their motivation comments and encouragement in each progress review to make my focus to the strategical research plan. Also, I wish to express gratitude to Sri Lanka Institute of Nanotechnology (SLINTEC) to give access to advanced laboratory facilities and scientists, Miss. Nadeeka Tissera, Mr. Ruchira Wijesena and Prof. Nalin de Silva who assisted and supported me while dedicating their valuable time. I also express my sincere gratitude to the academic and nonacademic staff of Department of Textile and Clothing Technology, University of Moratuwa for the continuous support and guidance given throughout my undergraduate and postgraduate life. Furthermore, I thank Nilupuli Rathnayake from the 15th batch and Sasini Weerasinghe from the 13th batch, Department of Textile and Clothing technology for all the support given to accomplish this research without any stress. The financial support for this research was provided through the SRC Grant (SRC/LT/2018/ 33) offered by the Senate Research Council, University of Moratuwa. v I would like to extend my sincere thanks to SRC for identifying the value of this research and approving the requested budget for this research. I would like to acknowledge Dr. (Mrs.) D.G.K. Dissanayake for appointing me as a research student to conduct this research under the above SRC grant. Last but not least, it is with a heart laden with gratitude that I thank to my family for the tremendous support given me and who were always there to lift me up during hard times. vi Table of contents Page Declaration of the candidate & supervisors i Abstract ii Dedication iii Acknowledgements iv Table of contents vi List of figures x List of tables xv List of abbreviations xvi List of appendices CHAPTER 01 xvii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Problem statement 2 1.3 Objectives 3 1.4 Chapter framework CHAPTER 02 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Importance of conductive yarns 5 2.3 Problems of existing conductive yarn manufacturing methods 5 2.4 Conductive polymers 6 2.5 Doping of conductive polymers 8 2.6 Polyaniline 10 2.7 Nanofibrous yarns 11 2.8 Electrospinning 11 2.9 Electrospinning yarns 12 2.10 Electrospun conductive yarns 15 2.11 Importance of biodegradability in smart textiles 15 2.12 Biodegradable applications in smart textiles 16 vii 2.13 Electrospinning of biodegradable polymers 16 2.14 Degradation of poly (e-caprolactone) 17 2.15 Electrospinning of conductive biodegradable polymers 17 2.16 Electrospun conductive and biodegradable yarns 18 2.17 Summary CHAPTER 03 3. METHODOLOGY 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Materials and reagents 20 3.3 Selection of suitable carrier polymer 21 3.3.1 Preparation of PVA and PCL polymer solution 21 3.3.2 Conventional electrospinning 21 3.3.3 Analyzing fiber mats to select the biodegradable polymer 21 3.4 Preparation of PANi blended yarns 22 3.4.1 Preparation of PANi solution 22 3.4.2 Preparation of PANi/PCL casted films 22 3.4.3 Preparation of PANi/PCL solution 23 3.4.4 Electrospinning by using rotary collector 23 3.4.5 Yarn preparation from nanofibrous web 24 3.4.6 Design and development of collector attachment for production of continuous nanofiber yarns 25 3.4.7 Continuous yarn production by electrospinning 27 3.5 Preparation of PANi coated yarns 27 3.5.1 Dip coating of PANi 27 3.5.2 PANi in-situ polymerization 27 3.5.3 Preparation of twisted yarns 28 3.6 Characterization 28 3.6.1 Fiber Morphology 28 3.6.2 Conductivity measurement 29 3.6.3 Tensile strength 31 3.6.4 DSC Analysis 31 3.6.5 FTIR analysis 31 viii 3.6.6 TGA analysis 31 3.6.7 Conductivity over mechanical deformation 31 3.6.8 Biodegradation of the material under controlled composting conditions 32 3.7 Applications 33 3.7.1 Capacitive sensor 33 3.7.2 Biomaterial 34 3.7.2.1 Biodegradability 34 3.7.2.2 Cell cytotoxicity study 35 3.7.2.3 Cell morphology study 36 3.8 Summary CHAPTER 04 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 37 4.1 Introduction 37 4.2 Electrospinning of PVA and PCL 37 4.3 PANi blended nanofibrous yarns 41 4.3.1 Influence of conductivity on electrospinnability 41 4.3.2 Conductivity measurement 45 4.3.3 Nanofibrous yarn formation 46 4.3.4 Continuous yarn formation 48 4.3.5 Effect of PANi concentration on mechanical properties of yarns 49 4.3.6 TGA analysis 51 4.3.7 DSC analysis 53 4.3.8 FTIR analysis 55 4.3.9 Optimizing PANi concentration 56 4.3.10 Electro-mechanical behaviour of electro-conductive yarn 56 4.3.10.1 Effect of weaving and sewing on electrical resistance of the yarn 56 4.3.10.2 Effect of strain on electrical resistance of the yarn 58 4.3.10.3 Effect of twist on electrical resistance of the yarn 59 4.3.11 Biodegradability 60 ix 4.4 PANi coated nanofibrous yarns 64 4.4.1 Effect of dip coating on PANi on fiber morphology, electrical and mechanical properties 64 4.4.2 Studying PANi in-situ polymerization 65 4.4.2.1 Polymerization of aniline on PCL nanofibers 65 4.4.2.2 Effect of concentration of reaction mixture on fiber morphology 69 4.4.3 Conductivity measurement 71 4.4.4 Nanofibrous yarn formation 74 4.4.5 Effect of aniline concentration on mechanical properties of yarn 75 4.4.6 TGA analysis 77 4.4.7 DSC analysis 79 4.4.8 FTIR analysis 81 4.4.9 Electro-mechanical behaviour of electro-conductive yarn 83 4.4.9.1 Effect of weaving and sewing on electrical resistance of the yarn 83 4.4.9.2 Effect of tensile strain on electrical resistance of the yarn 86 4.4.9.3 Effect of twist on electrical resistance of the yarn 87 4.4.10 Biodegradability 88 4.5 Comparison of PANi blended and coated yarns and potential applications 91 4.5.1 Capacitive sensor 92 4.5.2 Biocompatibility 93 4.5.2.1 Cytotoxic effects of the PANi blended nanofibers 93 4.5.2.2 Cell morphology study 93 4.5.2.3 In-vitro degradability 94 4.6 Summary 96 CHAPTER 05 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 97 5.1 Introduction 97 x 5.2 Key conclusions 97 5.3 Key recommendations 99 Reference list 100 Appendix A: Arduino code linked with cap sense library 113 Appendix B: Publications on this study 114 xi List of figures Figure Description Page Figure 2.1 Energy band diagram demonstrating band gaps 8 Figure 2.2 Band structure of a conjugated polymer as a function of p-doping level 9 Figure 2.3 Oxidation states of PANi 11 Figure 2.4 Electrospinning basic setup 12 Figure 2.5 Electrospinning continuous yarns using one nozzle 14 Figure 2.6 Electrospinning continuous yarns using two nozzles 14 Figure 3.1 Designed schematic diagram of modified electrospinning unit with rotational drum collector 24 Figure 3.2 Designed schematic diagram of apparatus for twisting single yarns and ply yarn. 25 Figure 3.3 Designed schematic diagram of continuous yarn forming setup 26 Figure 3.4 Schematic diagram of test circuit for measuring resistance with the four-point probe method 29 Figure 3.5 Schematic diagram of test circuit for measuring resistance of fiber ribbons with the two-probe method using multimeter 30 Figure 3.6 Schematic diagram of test circuit for measuring resistance of the yarn with the two-probe using multimeter 30 Figure 3.7 Homemade apparatus for measuring resistance vs strain 32 Figure 3.8 Basic circuit for capacitive sensors 34 Figure 3.9 Well plate with cells that were treated with nanofibers 35 Figure 4.1 SEM image and diameter distribution histogram of (a) PCL nanofibers, (b) PVA nanofibers 38 Figure 4.2 Illustration of hydrogen bonding interaction among PVA by water 38 Figure 4.3 Solutions of (a) emeraldine base (EB) PANi/PCL, (b) emeraldine base (EB) PANi/CSA/PCL, (c) emeraldine salt (ES) PANi (PANi doped by HCl)/CSA/PCL 40 xii Figure 4.4 Casted films of (a) emeraldine base (EB) PANi/PCL, (b) emeraldine base (EB) PANi/CSA/PCL, (c) emeraldine salt (ES) PANi (PANi doped by HCl)/CSA/PCL 40 Figure 4.5 Demonstrating conductive nanofiber electrospinning process 42 Figure 4.6 A photo of the electrospinning step with rotational drum collector 42 Figure 4.7 Morphology of nanofibers synthesized from different PANi concentrations and PCL. (a) pure PCL, (b) PANi 0.5%, (c) PANi 1%, (d) PANi 2%, (e) PANi 3% 44 Figure 4.8 (a) The four probe V - I characteristics of PANi blended electrospun mats, (b) PANi concentration vs conductivity measured using four- probe method 45 Figure 4.9 PANi 2%(a) Twisting single yarns, (b) twisting ply yarns, (c) PCL/PANi 1-ply yarn, (d) PCL/PANi 2-ply yarn, (d) PCL/PANi 3-ply yarn 47 Figure 4.10 Effect of number of plies on resistance 48 Figure 4.11 (a) Developed continuous yarn manufacturing unit, (b) 3D fibrous cone and twisted yarn 49 Figure 4.12 (a) The stress–strain curves of Pure PCL, PANi 0.5%, PANi 1%, PANi 2%, (b) effect of PANi concentration on energy at break value of yarns, (c) effect of PANi concentration on modulus of yarns 51 Figure 4.13 TGA profiles of pure PCL and conductive PANi/PCL yarns with different PCL to PANI ratio 53 Figure 4.14 DSC profiles of pure PCL and conductive PANi/PCL yarns with different PCL to PANI ratio 54 Figure 4.15 FTIR spectra of pure PCL and PANi 2% 55 Figure 4.16 PCL/PANi 2% blended nanofibrous yarns. (a) Image of yarn stitched on a nylon fabric, (b) microscopic image of yarn stitched on the nylon fabric 57 xiii Figure 4.17 Fabric woven with PANi 2% blended nanofibrous yarns and 2-ply nylon yarns. (a) Conductivity measuring of unfolded fabric, (b) conductivity measuring of folded fabric, (c) microscopic image the fabric, (d) demonstrating yarn short circuiting by folding, (e) illustrating resistance change by number of folding cycles 58 Figure 4.18 Effect of tensile strain on electrical resistance of PCL/PANi 2% blended yarn 59 Figure 4.19 PANi 2% nanofibrous fiber ribbons (a) as made, (b) twisted, (c) effect of twist on electrical resistance 60 Figure 4.20 Physical appearance of different stages of biodegradation of cellulose filter paper, PCL, PCL/PANi, and polyethylene 61 Figure 4.21 Residual weight percentages vs number of days in each stage of biodegradation 62 Figure 4.22 SEM images of (a) PCL before and (b) after degradation in soil and (c) magnified SEM image of after degradation in soil. (d) PCL/PANi blended fibers before and (e) after degradation in soil. (f) Magnified SEM image of after degradation in soil 63 Figure 4.23 (a and b) SEM image and its magnified image of 10% PANi dip coated PCL nanofibers. (c) Stress- strain curve of PCL pure and PANi 10% dip coated nanofibrous yarns 64 Figure 4.24 (a) Schematic of the apparatus for producing of continuous PCL twisted yarns. (a’) The 3D nanofibrous cone drawing from collector. (b and c) SEM image of collected PCL nanofibrous twisted yarn and magnified image of aligned nanofibers 66 Figure 4.25 Sketch illustration of Fabrication of PANi decorated PCL nano-fibrous yarns 66 Figure 4.26 Color change of aniline reaction mixture by adding APS after (a) 60 s, (b) 90 s, (c) 120 s, (d) 150 s, (e) 180 s, (f) 220 s, (g) 260 s, (h) 10 min. 68 Figure 4.27 SEM images of (a) Pure PCL, (b) aniline 0.5%, (c) aniline 1% (d) aniline 2% 70 xiv Figure 4.28 Resistance per unit length verses used aniline concentration in reaction mixture 71 Figure 4.29 (a) The four probe V - I characteristics of PANi coated electrospun mats, (b) aniline concentration vs log value of conductivity measured from four probe 73 Figure 4.30 SEM images of (a) 1- ply yarn, (b) 2 – ply yarn and (c) 3 – ply yarn 74 Figure 4.31 Effect of number of plies on resistance 75 Figure 4.32 (a) The stress–strain curves of Pure PCL, aniline 0.5%, aniline 1%, aniline 2%, (b) effect of aniline concentration on energy at break value of yarns, (c) effect of aniline concentration on modulus of yarns 77 Figure 4.33 TGA profiles of pure PCL, aniline 0.5%, aniline 1%, aniline 2% 79 Figure 4.34 DSC profiles of pure PCL, aniline 0.5%, aniline 1%, aniline 2% 80 Figure 4.35 FTIR spectra of pure PCL and aniline 1% 81 Figure 4.36 Aniline 1 % coated nanofibrous yarns. (a) Image of yarn stitched on a nylon fabric, (b) microscopic image of yarn stitched on the nylon fabric 83 Figure 4.37 Fabric woven with aniline 1% coated nanofibrous yarns and 2-ply nylon yarns. (a) Conductivity measuring of unfolded fabric, (b) conductivity measuring of folded fabric, (c) microscopic image the fabric, (d) SEM image of the fabric (e) demonstrating yarn short circuiting by folding, (f) illustrating resistance change by number of folding cycles 85 Figure 4.38 Effect of tensile strain on electrical resistance of yarn 86 Figure 4.39 Time-dependent normalized resistance change of the yarn under maximum strains of 20% 87 Figure 4.40 Aniline 1 % nanofibrous fiber ribbons (a) as made, (b) twisted, (c) effect of twist on electrical resistance 88 Figure 4.41 Residual weight percentage versus number of days in each stage of biodegradation 89 Figure 4.42 Physical appearance of different stages of biodegradation of cellulose filter paper, PCL, PCL/PANi and polyethylene 89 xv Figure 4.43 SEM images of PCL nanofiber (a) before degradation and (b-c) after degradation in soil. PANi/PCL nanofibers (d) before degradation and (e-f) after degradation in soil 90 Figure 4.44 Illustration of the electrical conductivity nature for the prepared PANi coated PANi /PCL yarns with application of flexible capacitive sensor for operation of LED (a) ON (c) OFF by touching 92 Figure 4.45 In-vitro cytotoxicity effects of the PCL and PANi/PCL electrospun nanofibers on Vero cells (green monkey kidney) 93 Figure 4.46 SEM images of (a) Vero cells seeded PCL nanofibers and (b) PCL/PANi nanofibers 94 Figure 4.47 Degradation profile of the PCL, and PANi blended PCL electrospun nanofibers 95 Figure 4.48 SEM images of the (a) PANi/PCL electrospun nanofibers after 20 days soaking in PBS and (b) magnified SEM image 95 xvi List of tables Table Description Page Table 3.1 The weight of PCL and PANi taken for preparing solutions and volume ratios of each solution in solution mixture 23 Table 3.2 Amounts of anile and APS taken for solution mixture 28 Table 4.1 Effect of different dopant on electrospinnability and resistance 41 Table 4.2 Measuring resistivity by different methods 46 Table 4.3 TGA data compilation for the tested fibers, including the first peak weight loss attributed to HCL, second onset and weight loss attributed to PANi, third onset and weight loss attributed to PCL and residual weight 52 Table 4.4 Melting temperature and melting enthalpy of pure PCL and conductive PANi/PCL yarns with different PCL to PANI ratio 54 Table 4.5 Characterization peaks of PCL and PANi 2% 55 Table 4.6 Volume of aniline in aniline/HCl mixture and the weight of APS in APS/HCl mixture 66 Table 4.7 Measuring resistivity by different methods 73 Table 4.8 TGA data compilation for the tested fibers, including weight loss attributed to HCL and water, second third onset and weight loss attributed to PCL and residual weight 88 Table 4.9 Melting temperature and melting enthalpy of pure PCL, aniline 0.5%, aniline 1%, aniline 2% 81 Table 4.10 Characterization peaks of PCL and PANi 2% for aniline 1% nanofibers 82 Table 5.1 Summary of important results of the study 98 xvii List of abbreviations Abbreviation Description PANi Polyaniline PCL Polycaprolactone CBNY Conductive and biodegradable nanofibrous yarn NY Nanofiber yarn SEM Scanning electron microscope FTIR Fourier transform infrared DSC Differential scanning calorimetry TGA Thermogravimetric PBS Phosphate-buffered saline ASTM American Society for Testing and Material xviii List of appendices Appendix Description Page Appendix A Arduino code linked with cap sense library 113 Appendix B Publications on this study 114