97 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY Ali, B., & Jacobs, M. (2020). A brief history of TrueType. Microsoft Learn. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/truetype/history G. V. Dias. (2005, April). Challenges of enabling IT in the Sinhala Language, 27th Internationalization and Unicode Conference, Berlin, Germany. An overview of Latin type anatomy – Fonts Knowledge - Google Fonts. (n.d.). Google Fonts. https://fonts.google.com/knowledge/introducing_type/an_overview_of_latin_ty pe_anatomy Arditi, A. (2004). Adjustable typography: an approach to enhancing low vision text accessibility. Ergonomics, 47(5), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000085680 Arditi, A., & Cho, J. (2005). Serifs and font legibility. Vision Research, 45(23), 2926–2933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013 Arobs. (2022, November 2). Digitization – what is it and why is it important? AROBS. Bababekova, Y., Rosenfield, M., Hue, J. E., & Huang, R. (2011). Font Size and Viewing Distance of Handheld Smart Phones. Optometry and Vision Science, 88(7), 795–797. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e3182198792 Bala, K., Sharma, S., & Kaur, G. (2015). A Study on Smartphone based Operating System. International Journal of Computer Applications, 121(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.5120/21504- 4351 Banerjee, J., & Bhattacharyya, M. (2011). Selection of the optimum font type and size interface for on screen continuous reading by young adults: an ergonomic approach. Journal of Human Ergology, 40(1–2), 47–62. 98 Biemiller, A. (1977). Relationships between Oral Reading Rates for Letters, Words, and Simple Text in the Development of Reading Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.2307/747307 Bigelow, C. (2019). Typeface features and legibility research. Vision Research, 165, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.05.003 Bigelow, C. (2019b). Typeface features and legibility research. Vision Research, 165, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.05.003 Bigelow, C. (2020). The Font Wars, Part 2. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/mahc.2020.2971745 Bigman, A. (2016). Digital Fonts: A condensed history. 99designs. https://99designs.com/blog/design-history-movements/history-of-digital-fonts/ Britannica, T. Editors of Encyclopaedia (2022, September 6). Latin alphabet. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Latin-alphabet Bryans, D. (2019). English monotype down under. Search.Informit.Org. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.638570576616224 Budrick, C. (2021, October 11). Swiss Style: The Principles, the Typefaces & the Designers. PRINT Magazine. https://www.printmag.com/featured/swiss-style-principles-typefaces- designers/ Campbell, N. W., & Kautz, J. (2014). Learning a manifold of fonts. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601212 99 Candello, H., Pinhanez, C. S., & Figueiredo, F. (2017). Typefaces and the Perception of Humanness in Natural Language Chatbots. Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025919 Chaparro, B. S., Shaikh, A. D., Chaparro, A., & Merkle, E. C. (2010). Comparing the legibility of six ClearType typefaces to Verdana and Times New Roman. Information Design Journal, 18(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.18.1.04cha Chapman, C. (2020, May 13). Lines of Communication – A Typeface History (with Infographic). Toptal Design Blog. https://www.toptal.com/designers/ui/typeface-history#Books%20For%20The%2 0Masses Digitalguide. (2019, February 19). UTF-8: the network standard. IONOS Digital Guide. Erickson, A. (2013). The ABC’s of font: effects of changing default fonts. EWU Digital Commons. https://dc.ewu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1107&context=theses FAQ - Fonts and Keyboards. (n.d.). https://www.unicode.org/faq/font_keyboard.html Habeeb, I. Q. (2020, September 20). SELECTION TECHNIQUE FOR MULTIPLE OUTPUTS OF OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342334915_SELECTION_TECHNIQUE FOR_MULTIPLE_OUTPUTS_OF_OPTICAL_CHARACTER_RECOGNITION Haley, A. (n.d.). x-Height. Cmscdn.Fonts.Com. https://cmscdn.fonts.com/documents/45a5dcc927619212/Fontology_x-height.pdf Hannah, J. (2022, December 3). What Is Typography, and Why Is It Important? A Beginner’s Guide. CareerFoundry. https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ui-design/beginners-guide-to- typography/ 100 Hojjati, N., & Muniandy, B. (2014). The Effects of Font Type and Spacing of Text for Online Readability and Performance. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6122 Huang, M. (2019, April 7). Understanding ISO-8859-1 / UTF-8. Mincong Huang. https://mincong.io/2019/04/07/understanding-iso-8859-1-and-utf-8/ Injosoft AB, http://www.injosoft.se. (n.d.). Windows-1252 overview. ASCII Code. Johnson, R. (n.d.-a). Improve your typography with “typographic contrast.” 3.7designs. Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 846–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280544000075 Khagwal, N. (2021, March 2). Legibility in User Interfaces - Prototypr | Prototyping. Prototypr. https://prototypr.io/post/legibility-in-user-interfaces Kumar, S. (2023, March 14). Understanding the Relationship Between DPI, Screen Resolution, and Image Pixel Density in Android Development. Medium. https://medium.com/@summitkumar/understanding-the-relationship-between- dpi-screen- resolution-and-image-pixel-density-in-android-b0ba27b7307a Laufer, B. (1998). The Development of Passive and Active Vocabulary in a Second Language: Same or Different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255 Lin, H., Wu, F., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Legibility and visual fatigue affected by text direction, screen size and character size on color LCD e-reader. Displays, 34(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2012.11.006 101 Loshin, P. (2021, September 9). ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange). WhatIs.com. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/ASCII-American-Standard-Code-f or-Information-Interchange Lupton, E. (2010). Thinking with Type, 2nd revised and expanded edition: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students. Princeton Architectural Press. MasterClass. (2021). Guide to Latin Typefaces: 9 Types of Latin Typefaces. MasterClass. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/latin-typeface-guide Material Design. (n.d.). Material Design. https://m2.material.io/design/color/text- legibility.html#legibility-standards Morson, S. (2015). Designing for iOS with Sketch. Apress. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4842-1458-9_1 Mueller, S. T., & Weidemann, C. T. (2012). Alphabetic letter identification: Effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.014 North, A. J., & Jenkins, L. B. (1951). Reading speed and comprehension as a function of typography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(4), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063094 Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. M., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023 Perera, R. (2023). 35+ Best Art Nouveau & Art Deco Fonts (Free & Premium) 2023. Designshack. https://designshack.net/articles/inspiration/art-nouveau-deco-fonts/ Radich, Q., White, S., Parente, J., & Kennedy, J. (2022, May 27). DPI and device-independent pixels - Win32 apps. Microsoft Learn. https://learn.microsoft.com/en- us/windows/win32/learnwin32/dpi-and-device-i ndependent-pixels 102 Rello, L., Pielot, M., & Marcos, M. C. (2016). Make It Big! Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858204 Rickner, T. (2016). Part 1: from TrueType GX to Variable Fonts. Monotype. https://userfiles.faso.us/7105/6456.pdf Riemersma, T. (n.d.). Display typography. https://www.compuphase.com/scrnfont.htm#:~:text=Computer%20displays%20 usually%20have%20a%20resolution%20of%2050,are%20available%20to%20for m%20a%20character%20is%20limited. Roemer, R. (2018, September 24). Mechanization of the Printing Press in the 19th Century. brewminate.com. https://brewminate.com/mechanization-of-the-printing-press-in-the-19th-centu ry/ Salingaros, N. A. (2003). The sensory value of ornament. Communication and Cognition. Monographies, 36, 331–351. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-16748-009 Sawyer, B. D., Reimer, B., & Chahine, N. (2020). The great typography bake-off: comparing legibility at-a-glance. Ergonomics, 63(4), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1714748 Sheedy, J. E., Subbaram, M. V., Zimmerman, A., & Hayes, J. P. (2005). Text Legibility and the Letter Superiority Effect. Human Factors, 47(4), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872005775570998 Shimada, J. (2006). The Font War. Courses.Cs.Washington.Edu. https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep590/06au/projects/font-wars.pdf Soleimani, H., & Mohammadi, E. (2012). The Effect of Text Typographical Features on Legibility, Comprehension, and Retrieval of EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n8p207 103 Statz, P. (2018, February 18). Typeface. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2010/02/typeface/ Stocks, E. J. (n.d.). https://fonts.google.com/knowledge/introducing_type/an_overview_of_latin_ty pe_anatomy. fonts.google.com https://fonts.google.com/knowledge/introducing_type/anoverviewoflatintypeanatomy Team, C. C. (2017, June 11). What’s in a Font? How Fonts Can Define Your Design. Adobe Blog. https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2017/06/11/whats-in-a-font-how-fonts-can- define- your-design Unicode Standard. (n.d.). https://www.unicode.org/standard/standard.html Velarde, O. (2017, November 30). A Visual Guide to the Anatomy of Typography [Infographic]. Visme. https://visme.co/blog/type-anatomy/ Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x Vinot, J.-L., & Athenes, S. (2012). Legible, are you sure?: an experimentation-based typographical design in safety-critical context. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2207676.2208387 White, R. (2015). Beginning Scribus. Apress. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1- 4842-0722-2_3 Williams, G. (2003). Font Creation with FontForge. TUGboat, 24. http://ftp.tug.org/TUGboat/tb24-3/williams.pdf 104 Xie, I., & Matusiak, K. K. (2015). Digitization of text and still images. In Discover Digital Libraries : Theory and Practice. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012417112100003X Young, J. (2014). A study of print and computer-based reading to measure and compare rates of comprehension and retention. New Library World, 115(7/8), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/nlw-05-2014-0051 Ziefle, M. (2010). Information presentation in small screen devices: The trade-off between visual density and menu foresight. Applied Ergonomics, 41(6), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.001 Ali, A. Z. M., Wahid, R., Samsudin, K., & Idris, M. Z. (2013). Reading on the Computer Screen: Does Font Type has Effects on Web Text Readability? International Education Studies, 6(3), p26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n3p26 Beier, S. (2009). Typeface Legibility: Towards defining familiarity. (PhD. Thesis). Royal College of Art, London, UK. Beier, S., & Larson, K. (2010). Design improvements for frequently misrecognized letters. Information Design Journal, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.18.2.03bei Beier, S., & Larson, K. (2013). How does typeface familiarity affect reading performance and reader preference? Information Design Journal, 20(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.20.1.02bei Bigelow, C., & Holmes, K. (2018). Science and history behind the design of Lucida. TUGboat, 39(3), 204–211. Boyarski, D., Neuwirth, C., Forlizzi, J., & Regli, S. H. (1998). A study of fonts designed for screen display. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’98, 87–94. Los Angeles, California, United States: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274658 105 Chandra, S., Bokil, P., & Udaya Kumar, D. (2017). Legibility: Same for All Scripts! In A. Chakrabarti & D. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2 (Vol. 66, pp. 833–843). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_71 Chung, S. T. L., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (1998). Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision Research, 38(19), 2949– 2962. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00072-8 Forbes, R. (2015). ScreenType Typography for the screen. Hojjati, N., & Muniandy, B. (2014). The Effects of Font Type and Spacing of Text for Online Readability and Performance. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6122 International Committee for Display Metrology (Ed.). (2012). Information Display Measurement Standard (1.03b). Society for Information Display. https://doi.org/10.55410/KMNV4563 Legge, G. E., & Bigelow, C. A. (2011). Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 8–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.5.8 Legros, L. A., & Grant, J. C. (1916). Typographical printing-surfaces: the technology and mechanism of their production. London: Longmans, Green, and Co. Nielson, J. (2015, November 15). Legibility, Readability, and Comprehension: Making Users Read Your Words. Retrieved from Nielsen Norman Group website: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/legibility-readability-comprehension/ Samarawickrama, S. (2017). Anatomy of the Sinhala Letter. Journal of Engineering and Architecture. https://doi.org/10.15640/jea.v5n1a9 106 Soleimani, H., & Mohammadi, E. (2012). The Effect of Text Typographical Features on Legibility, Comprehension, and Retrieval of EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 5(8), p207. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n8p207 Ssmr, S. (2016). The Anatomy and historical development of Sinhala typefaces. Retrieved from http://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/12750