R4TLI Conference Proceedings 2017 ISSN: 2513-2512 Paper Reference: R4TL (17) – C31 - 189 - Importance of Pedestrian Start-Up Times at Signalised Crosswalks Sewmini Jayatilake University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Niroshana Premachandra Road Development Authority, Sri Lanka Vasantha Wickramasinghe University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka 1. Introduction The total time required for pedestrians to cross the road is the summation of the time required to traverse the crosswalk and the pedestrian start-up time. But most signal time calculations do not pay attention to start-up time. This may result in dangerous situations caused due to pedestrian-vehicle interactions. Pedestrian start-up time is the difference between the time at which the pedestrian stepped off the curb to cross the road and the time at which the pedestrian signal phase turns into green. If the pedestrian steps off the curb during red phase, then it is early start-up time. If the pedestrian steps off the curb during green phase, it is delayed start-up time. Pedestrian behaviour varies according to several factors. Knoblauch et al. (1996), have considered weather, age, gender, curb height etc. and data were categorised accordingly. But Golani and Damti (2007), have considered the behaviour of a group of pedestrians. In this research, age, gender, group size and the familiarity of the pedestrians to the signal phase were considered. When considering the results of Vujanic et al. (2014), 17.5% pedestrians have started crossing during red phase. The highest number of offenders of both genders is under the age of 30 and the majority is male. This paper shows the importance in considering start-up times of pedestrians at signalised crosswalks. 2. Objectives The objectives are primarily to find the start-up times of pedestrians crossing at signalised crosswalks, and secondly to find the variation of start-up time by age, gender, group size and pedestrian’s familiarity with signal phase. R4TLI Conference Proceedings 2017 Paper Reference: R4TL (17) – C31 - 190 - 3. Methodology Signalised crosswalks with time indication were selected at intersections, and at each location video surveying was done. Using the captured video data, images were extracted with an accuracy of 0.1s. In finding the start-up times, pedestrians at the front line who are waiting for the pedestrian’s signal phase to turn into green were considered. Start-up times were calculated using the extracted images while observing the age, gender and group size of each pedestrian. The next analysis of start-up time was done using ‘Easy fit’ software and start-up times were graphically interpreted. ‘Z test’ was carried out to check whether there is a significant difference between data gathered in two main cities in Sri Lanka (i.e., Kandy and Colombo). Kandy has recently installed pedestrian signals while Colombo is having a long history of signalized pedestrian crossings. Probability analysis was done for early and delayed start-up times under each factor separately. Finally, a matrix of probability values was created. 4. Results A total of 194 pedestrian crossing phases with 1,420 pedestrians were captured and considered in Kandy, and 158 crossing phases with 672 pedestrians were captured and considered in Colombo. Next, probability curves were obtained separately for early and delayed start-up times in the two cities and standard deviations were found for each as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Mean and Standard Deviation Total start-up time (s) Early start-up time (s) Delayed start-up time (s) Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation Mean Standard Deviation Total 0.05 (0.69) 1.43 (1.36) -1.23 (-0.95) 1.21 (0.74) 0.93 (1.39) 0.69 (0.82) Male -0.08 (0.74) 1.45 (1.36) -1.27 (-1.00) 1.17 (0.76) 0.92 (1.41) 0.67 (0.83) Female 0.20 (0.61) 1.40 (1.32) -1.16 (-0.87) 1.28 (0.70) 0.94 (1.36) 0.70 (0.67) Alone 0.02 (0.67) 1.44 (1.39) -1.24 (-0.99) 1.22 (0.76) 0.92 (1.40) 0.68 (0.85) Group 0.33 (0.84) 1.37 (1.12) -1.06 (-0.70) 1.16 (0.59) 1.02 (1.35) 0.75 (0.68) 10-30 -0.02 (0.51) 1.43 (1.27) -1.23 (-0.90) 1.27 (0.81) 0.89 (1.21) 0.61 (0.76) 30-60 0.12 (0.77) 1.38 (1.39) -1.17 (-0.99) 1.13 (0.71) 0.94 (1.49) 0.71 (0.84) Above60 -0.23 (1.06) 1.66 (1.28) -1.52 (-0.93) 1.43 (0.55) 0.97 (1.58) 0.68 (0.68) R4TLI Conference Proceedings 2017 Paper Reference: R4TL (17) – C31 - 191 - Legend 1.0 - Kandy (1.0) - Colombo Using those curves, the cumulative probability curves were plotted separately as shown in Figures 1 to 3. Z statistic showed that the start-up times in two cities are significantly different. The probability matrix created separately for the two cities can be used to find the probability of an individual to different start-up time ranges when the age, gender & group size of that pedestrian is known. Figure 1: Cumulative probability variation for early start-up times of male & female pedestrians in Kandy Figure 2: Cumulative probability variation for early start-up times according to group size in Kandy 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 Cu m ul at iv e Pr ob ab ili ty (% ) Start-up time (s) Early start-up time (Gender) Male 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 Cu m ul at iv e Pr ob ab ili ty (% ) Start-up time (s) Early start-up time (Group size) Alone Group R4TLI Conference Proceedings 2017 Paper Reference: R4TL (17) – C31 - 192 - Figure 3: Cumulative probability variation for early start-up times according to age groups in Kandy Table 2: Probability Matrix Start-up time Total Male Female Alone Group 10 to 30 30 to 60 Above 60 -4.1 to -5 1.58 1.10 0.48 1.3 0.27 0.69 0.75 0.14 -3.1 to -4 1.58 (0.15) 0.89 (0.15) 0.69 (0) 1.51 (0.15) 0.07 (0) 0.21 (0.15) 1.17 (0) 0.21 (0) -2.1 to -3 4.8 (2.98) 3.16 (1.93) 1.65 (1.04) 4.46 (2.83) 0.34 (0.15) 1.1 (1.34) 2.81 (1.64) 0.89 (0) -1.1 to -2 9.47 (7.89) 6.04 (5.36) 3.43 (2.53) 8.92 (6.99) 0.55 (0.89) 2.06 (2.98) 6.18 (4.17) 1.24 (0.74) 0 to -1 24.37 (19.64) 13.52 (11.9) 10.84 (7.74) 21.83 (16.67) 2.54 (2.98) 6.31 (8.33) 15.58 (10.42) 2.47 (0.89) 0.1 to 1 35.35 (25.45) 17.30 (17.11) 18.05 (8.33) 31.64 (21.73) 3.71 (3.72) 8.37 (10.57) 23.75 (13.10) 3.23 (1.79) 1.1 to 2 18.74 (28.87) 9.20 (20.24) 9.54 (8.63) 16.27 (23.51) 2.47 (5.36) 4.32 (9.85) 12.70 (16.07) 1.72 (2.98) 2.1 to 3 4.05 (11.90) 1.99 (8.48) 2.06 (3.42) 3.43 (9.67) 0.62 (2.23) 0.55 (3.72) 3.02 (6.99) 0.48 (1.19) 3.1 to 4 0.27 (3.12) 0.14 (2.08) 0.14 (10.40) 0.21 (3.12) 0.07 (0) 0 (0.45) 0.27 (2.38) 0 (0.03) Legend 2.0 - Pedestrians are not familiar with the signal phase (2.0) - Pedestrians are familiar with the signal phase 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 Cu m ul at iv e Pr ob ab ili ty (% ) Start-up time (s) Early start-up time (Age groups) 10 to 30 age 30 to 60 age above 60 age R4TLI Conference Proceedings 2017 Paper Reference: R4TL (17) – C31 - 193 - 5. Conclusion Pedestrians in Kandy have an early start-up when compared with pedestrians in Colombo. Therefore, pedestrians’ familiarity to signal phases affect start-up times. Male pedestrians have early start-up times than female pedestrians. Pedestrians who are alone have early start-up times than pedestrians who cross in groups. Start-up times show different variations within different age groups. Therefore, consideration of start-up times of pedestrians is important to improve the safety of pedestrians. 6. References R.L. Knoblauch, M.T. Pietrucha & M. Nitzburg. (1996) Field Studies of Pedestrians Walking Speed and Start-up Time. In Transportation Research Record 1538, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington. D.C., pp27-38 A. Golani, H. Damti. Model for Estimating Crossing Times at High Occupancy Crosswalks. In Transportation Research Record No.2002, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington. D.C.,2007, pp125-130 M. Vujanic, D. Pesic, B. Antic & E. Smailovic. Pedestrian Risk at the Signalized Pedestrian Crossing Equipped with Countdown Display. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering. Volume 4(1), pp52-61 Keywords: start-up time, early start-up, delayed start-up