Abstract:
The research Support to comprehend the beneficial mutualistic relationship between architectural and biological systems and to investigate the mutualistic successive architecture (MSA) accommodate spatial habitat of wildlife in the tourism-related buildings within Sigiriya, Dambulla zone. The analytical study framework to analyse the local case studies critically through a wide discussion of MSA through the general “components” of architectural designs, investigating the concepts of the animal behaviour, understanding the connections of the site planning and design with ecology. The valuation of the constructed form and the natural habitats must be examined and created in order to determine how they interact in a mutually beneficial and symphonic manner. The architectural focus needs to be moved to pristine and vulnerable areas where tourism accommodation has left huge environmental impacts. Selected two cases to have extreme differentiate and similarity with two different scales. Wildlife habitat has permanent and temporal behaviour within this zone while both projects have caused the implications towards wildlife negatively and positively. Simultaneously that was the need to do the research about MS implications on wildlife within anthropogenic activities. Qualitative measures have converted to quantitative measures by using ratings and graphs. Mutualistic and resilience quality of both projects are similar to different approaches from the beginning. Hence, when considering the MSA in a project, it is essential to consider the materials and the life cycle of the materials and its performance. Considering architecture and mutual relationship in a human enclosure within wildlife habitats, the author has identified that long research has to be done to find out the MSA in a project, which engages wildlife habitats.
