Abstract:
Fine aggregates are one of prime constitute in asphalt mix design. However, the effect of fine
a8SreSale morphology (angularity) on asphalt mixtures behaviour is well recognized in
literature. For example, the excessive use of natural fine aggregates (less angular or rounded
shape) over manufactured sand (angular shape) reduce shear strength of mixes and reflect
premature rutting phenomena on asphalt pavements. In the other words, fine aggregate
angularity largely influences particle packing behaviour and ultimately affects stability and
mechanical performance of asphalt mixes. In the present scenario, the fine aggregate shape is
characterized using two well-known approaches. The first is conventional approach defined
by Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) in the early nineties. The conventional
approach measure fine aggregate angularity (FAA) value as the percentage of air voids
present in loosely compacted fine aggregates. The basic underlying principle is that the
aggregate with more number of fractured faces will give higher air voids. However,
Superpave system defined the minimum requirement of FAA is 45 for the use in high traffic
pavements. The second approach uses computer automated Aggregate Image Measurement
System (AIMS) to characterize fine aggregate shape. AIMS works on digital image technique
and measure fine aggregate angularity in the range of 1 to 10000. In addition, it further
classifies the angularity values in different ranges i.e. low or rounded (1 to 2100), moderate
(2100-3975), high (3975-5400) and extreme or highly angular (5400-10000). The current
study measure and compare angularity of four different sizes, namely FA1 (P2.36-R 1.18:
passing through 2.36 mm and retaining on 1.18 mm sieve), FA2 (PI. 18- 0.600), FA3
(P0.600-R0.300) and FA4 (P0.300-R0.150) of basaltic type fine aggregates using digital
image technique and conventional approach. Additionally, an Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
statistical approach was used to study the effect of aggregate size on angularity. The result
and analysis reveal that both approaches for angularity measurement were provided different
ranking among aggregate sizes. Also, it is found that measured angularity from both
approaches were showing a negative Pearson’s-correlation coefficient (r) 0.82, indicating
strong negative correlation. The indirect measurement and associated higher subjectivity of
FAA test method may be a probable cause for negative correlation with digital image technique approach. It is expected that the findings from the study will add strength to
existing research repository. The study may also help over quality control of aggregates.
Further, the study will pave the way to adoption of new technologies over conventional
practices
