Abstract:
Many experimental studies to date have investigated CO2 sequestration in coal using small-scale samples
(usually less than 100mm in length), and the results may not be applicable to large-scale samples which
better represent in-situ conditions for the estimation of CO2 flow behaviours in coal. This study was
therefore initiated to determine the sub- and super-critical CO2 flow characteristics in a large reconstituted
bituminous coal sample (203mm in diameter and 1m in length) by performing three sets of N2
and CO2 injections with injection pressures from 6MPa to 10 MPa under 11 MPa axial stress and at 37 C.
It was observed that, unlike N2 permeability which increases with injection pressure, CO2 permeability
exhibits reductions with injection pressure due to greater swelling effects at elevated CO2 pressures. The
second N2 injections into the coal sample previously flooded with CO2 showed reductions in permeability
compared to the first N2 injection into the original coal sample, because the coal structure had
been altered considerably by the CO2 flows. The pressure build-up at downstream for CO2 injection is
always lower than that for the first N2 injection due to reduced CO2 flows as a result of decreased
permeability, which also contributes to the lower pressure development at downstream for the second
N2 injections. The pressure profiles along the sample are similar for the first N2 and CO2 injections with
relatively greater pressure decays for CO2, while considerable pressure reductions were observed for the
second N2 injections, especially in the regions near the injection point where greater CO2 pressures
previously existed, causing greater structural rearrangement in those regions. The second N2 injection
causes less volumetric strain of the sample than the first due to the altered coal structure induced by the
prior CO2 flows which impede gas flow in the sample.
Citation:
Zhang, X., Ranjith, P. G., & Ranathunga, A. S. (2019). Sub- and super-critical carbon dioxide flow variations in large high-rank coal specimen: An experimental study. Energy, 181, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.213