Abstract:
The demand for green buildings is growing, but the trend is below the expected level due to the perceived
higher construction cost required by building investors. In addition, the industry or the practitioners
knowledge and awareness of major operational cost savings of facilities is questionable. on that note, this
study aims to establish the cost implications of green buildings via a comparative life-cycle cost analysis
of two green certified industrial and one traditional building. The industrial sector is one of the largest
energy consuming sectors in the world with over 50% of the world’s total delivered energy is absorbed
by the sector. Energy consumption of industrial sector is likely to increase more due to the economic
and population growth.
The data for the analysis were extracted from construction, operation, and maintenance expenditure
budget records of the selected organisations. The analysis shows that in terms of life-cycle costs, green
industrial buildings are 17% cheaper than that of traditional buildings. Though the initial construction
cost of a green industrial building is 29% higher, the operation and maintenance costs of green buildings
result in 23% and 15% overall savings throughout the life cycle. The findings provide further empirical
proof of the benefits of green buildings, especially in industrial manufacturing where it is expected to
improve future uptakes and consequently the achievement of sustainable development initiatives.
Citation:
Weerasinghe, A. S., Ramachandra, T., & Rotimi, J. O. B. (2021). Comparative life-cycle cost (LCC) study of green and traditional industrial buildings in Sri Lanka. Energy and Buildings, 234, 110732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110732