Buildings Vs. Architecture

dc.contributor.authorSri Nmmuni, V
dc.date.accessioned1987T03:57:48Z
dc.date.available1987T03:57:48Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.description.abstractIn both instances there is understanding and sympathy for the wronged professional. For, although the doctor is in overall charge of the physical well-being of the patient (and the politician, the management of the society) there is instant recognition that many of the secondary responsibilities of this task have been delegated to various other agencies. Neither the doctor nor the politician is thus unduly worried (and therefore minds his own business) and live to worry on the day their essential business (and therefore their specific responsibilities) are found to be un attended to. This seeming selfishness, as Ayn Rand would explain, has its merits. Worry, when selfish, focusses examination on the essentials and therefore, hope­fully, on the specific role of the professional. This is how professions evolved and are strengthened and their role more clearly defined and shortcomings overcomeen_US
dc.identifier.conferenceARU papersen_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Architectureen_US
dc.identifier.facultyArchitectureen_US
dc.identifier.pgnosp. 9-11en_US
dc.identifier.placeMoratuwaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/15706
dc.identifier.year1987en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBuildingsen_US
dc.subjectArchitectureen_US
dc.titleBuildings Vs. Architectureen_US

Files

Collections