EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONMETHODS USED IN THE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN SRI LANKA

dc.contributor.advisorCritical Factors in Dispute Resolution
dc.contributor.advisorExpressway Construction Projects
dc.contributor.advisorDAB;Cross Case Analysis.
dc.contributor.authorGammanpila, CM
dc.contributor.authorAbeynayake, M
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-29T05:54:04Z
dc.date.available2016-08-29T05:54:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-29
dc.description.abstractEffectiveness of dispute resolution affects immensely for success or failure of construction projects. This document consists of a literature review about alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods including negotiation, mediation, Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB), ad-hoc adjudication, arbitration and ten critical factors affecting to effectiveness of ADR methods such as cost, speed, relationships, fairness etc. After decades of use there is no clear detailed analysis about used alternative dispute resolution in highway projects for their effectiveness and efficiency. In order to fulfil this gap, this research is conducted to evaluate effectiveness of used ADR methods regarding ten critical factors. The research methodology adapted was qualitative within multiple case studies from disputes arisen in Expressway Construction projects. The primary data collection techniques used in this study were ADR documents and semi structured interviews. Content analysis was used to analyse these documents and cross case analysis to compare cases findings to each other. The research findings revealed that ratings for critical factors fluctuate from case to case significantly. In the discussion of research findings, key attributes identify which was the cause for fluctuations. So one cannot simply say this or that factor affects most to the success and this ADR method is best way to deal with disputes. According to study it’s not fair to deal with every dispute in the same manner, so categorization of disputes concerning key attributes needed for improved efficiency of ADR methods. Guidelines developed include steps, tables and flowcharts for using ADR methods effectively. These findings and guidelines are presented in a logical, systematic and a sensible way to identify the ideal ADR method for a given dispute rather than relying on subjective decisions. It is hoped that these findings and guidelines will be useful to the stakeholders in future highway projects and can be adapted to the whole industry.en_US
dc.identifier.conferenceThe 5th World Construction Symposium 2016en_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Building Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.emailchandith.manasa@gmail.comen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 174-185en_US
dc.identifier.placecolomboen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/11958
dc.identifier.year2016en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAlternative Dispute Resolutionen_US
dc.subjectCritical Factors in Dispute Resolution
dc.subjectExpressway Construction Projects
dc.subjectDAB
dc.subjectCross Case Analysis.
dc.titleEFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTIONMETHODS USED IN THE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN SRI LANKAen_US
dc.typeConference-Full-texten_US

Files