Monotonic loading test to investigate the benefits of composite geogrids for subgrade improvement

dc.contributor.authorWimalasena, K
dc.contributor.authorGallage, C
dc.contributor.authorJayalath, C
dc.contributor.authorChurchill, J
dc.contributor.editorPasindu, HR
dc.contributor.editorBandara, S
dc.contributor.editorMampearachchi, WK
dc.contributor.editorFwa, TF
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-20T08:59:58Z
dc.date.available2023-01-20T08:59:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe presence of weak subgrades is one of the greatest challenges in constructing road pavements. Conventionally, techniques such as refiling with suitable material and soil stabilisation are considered to improve subgrade condition, ignoring the additional project cost. However, geogrids have gained popularity as economical, expedite and sustainable subgrade improvement techniques over recent times. Although many studies have been conducted to assess the suitability of biaxial geogrids, limited studies have been performed to check the suitability of composite geogrids for subgrade improvement, despite assuming that composite geogrids extend additional benefits. In this study, two model tests: one unreinforced and one composite geogrid reinforced, were constructed in a steel box with length, width, and height of 1 m, 1 m and 1.2 m, respectively. The subgrade was prepared to a thickness of 500 mm, achieving CBR 2.5% bearing capacity. A granular layer of 200 mm was constructed on top of the subgrade achieving 100% degree of compaction frommaximum dry density. In the reinforced section, composite geogrid was placed at the base subgrade interface. Both model sections were subjected to a monotonic load at a rate of 1 mm/min, applied on the top surface of the granular layer through a circular plate of 200 mm diameter, until the occurrence of ultimate failure. Results demonstrate that reinforcing the weak subgrade by a composite geogrid has increased the ultimate bearing capacity by 53%. In addition, the overall section modulus of the composite geogrid reinforced section is higher than the modulus of the unreinforced section.en_US
dc.identifier.citation*****en_US
dc.identifier.conferenceRoad and Airfield Pavement Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87379-0_35en_US
dc.identifier.emailmataramb@qut.edu.auen_US
dc.identifier.facultyEngineeringen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 469-482en_US
dc.identifier.proceedingProceedings of 12th International Conference on Road and Airfield Pavement Technology, 2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20214
dc.identifier.year2021en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectPavement engineeringen_US
dc.subjectPavement materialen_US
dc.subjectComposite geogriden_US
dc.subjectGeogridsen_US
dc.subjectWeak subgradeen_US
dc.subjectBearing capacityen_US
dc.titleMonotonic loading test to investigate the benefits of composite geogrids for subgrade improvementen_US
dc.typeConference-Full-texten_US

Files

Collections