Investigating the motivation for implementing unsolicited proposals in the Sri Lankan construction industry

dc.contributor.authorThennakoon, TMPN
dc.contributor.authorJayasena, HS
dc.contributor.authorWeerapperuma, US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-14T09:26:26Z
dc.date.available2023-08-14T09:26:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-21
dc.description.abstractInfrastructure development can be identified as a key driver of economic growth. Most developing countries have prioritised implementing new procurement arrangements to execute public infrastructure projects throughout their life cycle efficiently. Private Public Partnership (PPP) procurement arrangement is one of the popular procurement arrangements, which can be classified as solicited proposals (SPs) and unsolicited proposals (USPs). Most countries have adopted USP for infrastructure projects among those two arrangements. Nevertheless, USPs have several drawbacks than SPs, such as corruption, low social and economic benefits, low value for money, and lack of transparency. However, governments are still developing their infrastructure projects as USPs due to the government's motivational aspects towards them. Therefore, it is controversial how those motivations have a huge impact than drawbacks in implementing USPs. Thus, this study aims to investigate the motivation for implementing USPs specific to the Sri Lankan context. Accordingly, a qualitatively based extensive literature synthesis has been conducted concerning the practices of USPs. Following the qualitative approach, data were collected through twelve (12) semi-structured interviews with industry professionals familiar with USPs implementation. The findings revealed that governments often choose USPs due to limitations in their capacity to identify and evaluate large-scale projects. These limitations can be financial and technical, including a lack of expertise. While speculation exists about corrupt practices associated with unsolicited PPPs, it is difficult to validate such claims. However, it is acknowledged that unsolicited PPPs, in their current state, offer higher opportunities for corruption. Nonetheless, accessing private financing quickly and efficiently for PPPs is also a positive motivation for choosing the unsolicited approach.en_US
dc.identifier.conferenceWorld Construction Symposium - 2023en_US
dc.identifier.departmentDepartment of Building Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31705/WCS.2023.50en_US
dc.identifier.emailpiyuminisansala517@gmail.comen_US
dc.identifier.emailsuranga@uom.lken_US
dc.identifier.emailumeshas@uom.lken_US
dc.identifier.facultyArchitectureen_US
dc.identifier.pgnospp. 606-619en_US
dc.identifier.placeSri Lankaen_US
dc.identifier.proceeding11th World Construction Symposium - 2023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/21306
dc.identifier.year2023en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCeylon Institute of Builders - Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectGovernments' Motivationen_US
dc.subjectProcurementen_US
dc.subjectPrivate Public Partnership (PPP)en_US
dc.subjectUnsolicited Proposals (USP).en_US
dc.titleInvestigating the motivation for implementing unsolicited proposals in the Sri Lankan construction industryen_US
dc.typeConference-Full-texten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
50-S15079.pdf
Size:
293.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections