Fire performance analyses of modular wall panel designs with loadbearing SHS columns

dc.contributor.authorPerera, D
dc.contributor.authorUpasiri, IR
dc.contributor.authorPoologanathan, K
dc.contributor.authorPerampalam, G
dc.contributor.authorO’Grady, K
dc.contributor.authorRezazadeh, M
dc.contributor.authorRajanayagam, H
dc.contributor.authorHewavitharana, T
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T08:15:33Z
dc.date.available2023-06-23T08:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractModular Building Systems (MBS) are still in the phase of developing its popularity in the industry, with emerging novel designs. Initially, MBS walls and floors had been highly influenced by the Light-gauge Steel Frame (LSF) designs made of Cold-Formed (CF) steel studs, either as loadbearing or non-loadbearing types which have been extensively researched all over the world. However, recently the MBS practice in the industry tends to incorporate Square Hollow Section (SHS) steel columns for their improved structural performance and convenience at the manufacturing stage despite of the limited research knowledge in terms of the Fire Resistance Level (FRL). Moreover, catastrophic failures and fatal accidents are common with steel-based structures in case of a fire. Hence, the fire performance of loadbearing modular walls with SHS columns have been identified as a critical research gap. Firstly, Finite Element Models (FEM) were developed for the original modular wall, a Light-weight Timber Frame (LTF) wall and some LSF walls. The FEM analyses results very well matched with the full-scale experimental results so that the FEM techniques were confidently used to study the effect of variables chosen based on material availability options, cost reduction and construction practice. Structural and Insulation FRLs have been evaluated for the chosen parametric walls, where the produced graphs of structural and insulation FRLs can be referred to determine the adequate thickness of column sheathing and the Insulation Ratio (IR) respectively. The choice of non-loadbearing stud type can be evaluated against other limitations related to energy, cost and construction practiceen_US
dc.identifier.citationPerera, D., Upasiri, I. R., Poologanathan, K., Perampalam, G., O’Grady, K., Rezazadeh, M., Rajanayagam, H., & Hewavitharana, T. (2022). Fire performance analyses of modular wall panel designs with loadbearing SHS columns. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01179[18p.]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01179en_US
dc.identifier.databaseScienceDirecten_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01179en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-5095en_US
dc.identifier.journalCase Studies in Construction Materialsen_US
dc.identifier.pgnose01179[18p.]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/21151
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.year2022en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectLoadbearing modular wallsen_US
dc.subjectSquare Hollow Sectionen_US
dc.subjectStructural FRLen_US
dc.subjectLoad Ratioen_US
dc.subjectInsulation Ratioen_US
dc.subjectHeat Transfer Analysesen_US
dc.titleFire performance analyses of modular wall panel designs with loadbearing SHS columnsen_US
dc.typeArticle-Full-texten_US

Files