Philosophical grounding and computational formalization for practice based engineering knowledge

dc.contributor.authorDias, WPS
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T03:18:49Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06T03:18:49Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractMichael Polanyi’s idea of tacit knowing and Martin Heidegger’s concept of pre-theoretical shared practice are presented as providing a strong rationale for the notion of practice based knowledge. Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Case Based Reasoning (CBR) and Grounded Theory (with Interval Probability Theory) are able to model these philosophical concepts related to practice based knowledge. The AI techniques appropriate for modeling Polanyi’s and Heidegger’s ideas should be founded more on a connectionist rather than a cognitivist paradigm. Examples from engineering practice are used to demonstrate how the above techniques can capture, structure and make available such knowledge to practitioners.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDias, W. P. S. (2007). Philosophical grounding and computational formalization for practice based engineering knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(4), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2006.06.002en_US
dc.identifier.databaseScienceDirecten_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2006.06.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-7051en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.journalKnowledge-Based Systemsen_US
dc.identifier.pgnos382-387en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20371
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.year2007en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPractice based knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectConnectionist AI techniquesen_US
dc.subjectTacit knowing; Shared practiceen_US
dc.titlePhilosophical grounding and computational formalization for practice based engineering knowledgeen_US
dc.typeArticle-Full-texten_US

Files