Embodied energy of mud concrete block (MCB) versus brick and cement blocks

dc.contributor.authorUdawattha, C
dc.contributor.authorHalwatura, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T07:40:41Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T07:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstracttThe concept of calculating embodied energy because it’s a wholistic method of measuring the sustain-ability factor of building materials. By definition, the embodied energy is the sum of all the types of energyconsumed while producing a specific product or a service. Mud concrete block is a novel walling materialand there are few studies on embodied energy calculations for cement stabilized soil walling materials.In this study, the embedded energy of mud concrete block and other most industrious walling materialssuch as brick and cement block were calculated and compared concording to the source of their energy.The process analysis and hierarchical structure of energy consumptions were used to account the totalembodied energy content. Ten feet (length) by ten feet (width) wall (hundred square feet) was used tocompare the energy content.The brick is the highest embodied energy walling material. The mud concrete block has the loweston account of transport of raw materials (cement) from the factory and the already embedded energy ofcement. The cement has intermediate level of embodied energy. The extended research was carried out tofind out the sustainability of the energy sources used to build these walling materials. The brick productionwas done using more or less sustainable energy sources such as biomass. Biomass is a renewable energysource and its fairly cheaper energy source in Sri Lanka. But mud concrete block and cement block usingnonrenewable energy sources can be replaced by renewable energy sources and developed into moresustainable walling materials.en_US
dc.identifier.citationUdawattha, C., & Halwatura, R. (2016). Embodied energy of mud concrete block (MCB) versus brick and cement blocks. Energy and Buildings, 126, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.059en_US
dc.identifier.databaseScienceDirecten_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.059en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788en_US
dc.identifier.journalEnergy and Buildingsen_US
dc.identifier.pgnos28-35en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dl.lib.uom.lk/handle/123/20705
dc.identifier.volume126en_US
dc.identifier.year2016en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.subjectEmbodied energyen_US
dc.subjectEnergy contenten_US
dc.subjectProcess analysisen_US
dc.subjectBricken_US
dc.subjectCement blocken_US
dc.subjectMud concrete blockaen_US
dc.titleEmbodied energy of mud concrete block (MCB) versus brick and cement blocksen_US
dc.typeArticle-Full-texten_US

Files